would you pay $400,000 p.a for haselby

fonz_#15 · Post: # 449344Post **fonz_#15** » Mon 03 Sep 2007 11:47pm

rumoured to be the money he is currently earning.

is 26 years old, and was told the may have to take a substancial pay cut to remain at the dockers or test the open market if he thinks he can get that type of money.

is he worth putting in an offer for?

bungiton · Post: # 449346Post **bungiton** » Mon 03 Sep 2007 11:51pm

nope, slow, and has a few problems with authority and especially being told to lay off the sauce.

johnpeterbudgefanclub · Mon 03 Sep 2007 11:52pm

Ditto. Plenty of others around that would be worth enticing.

fonz_#15 · Post: # 449349Post **fonz_#15** » Mon 03 Sep 2007 11:54pm

i agree with both of your views..just thought i would throw it up to see what the consensus is..

the fact he plays for freo doesn't help

bungiton · Post: # 449354Post **bungiton** » Mon 03 Sep 2007 11:58pm

Also the fact that for the last game of the year, supposedly with the dockers mathematically a chance to play finals, so said the worst orstrayan newspaper, Hase was suspended for missing a recovery session.

Sam23 · Post: # 449356Post **Sam23** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:00am

He's not slow at all.

I'd def. get him.

stinger · Post: # 449358Post **stinger** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:01am

200,000 grand tops...but he's a dropkick.....

johnpeterbudgefanclub · Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:01am

Sam23 wrote:He's not slow at all.

I'd def. get him.

Pfft. Say what? Not slow?....finds the pill but hardly pacey.

Sam23 · Post: # 449360Post **Sam23** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:03am

He'd be as quick as Lenny after the reco.

He can move when he wants.

Stinger....we pay Briss 180k a year...

Hase >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Birss.

You all underrate Hase signnificantly.

Unforgiven · Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:05am

not for 400k...

Though maybe I don't understand? would 400k per anum, be a crap deal, like is that 1.2mil for 3 years?. Maybe I don't get it.

fonz_#15 · Post: # 449363Post **fonz_#15** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:06am

he was a lot better 3 years ago imo.

birss 180k p.a seems fair, hasleby can have no more than 250,000

Sam23 · Post: # 449364Post **Sam23** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:09am

Agree Birss 180k a year seems fair.

I'd probably give Hase a 1 mill deal for 3 years...

He was the premier mid in the league for the first 8 weeks this season before he got injured.

Then started dominating from 14-19 and has struggled since...

absoloute gun.

SaintWodonga · Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:12am

No way! Forget him!

fonz_#15 · Post: # 449369Post **fonz_#15** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:15am

gee sam 23 you overrate him by calling him the premier midfielder early in the year

thats still 330k p.a... a little too much

ausfatcat · Post: # 449376Post **ausfatcat** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:19am

fonz_#15 wrote:gee sam 23 you overrate him by calling him the premier midfielder early in the year

thats still 330k p.a... a little too much

prbably a mood point anyway because I would be surprised if we coould fit that into the salary cap with the nick's deals a nd kosi coming up.

The_Dud · Post: # 449380Post **The_Dud** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:22am

no way for 400K

i would take him if it didn't cost too much tho

st.byron · Post: # 449383Post **st.byron** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:25am

Nope. Past his best. Has lost some of his sting.

vacuous space · Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:31am

If we can fit him into the cap, we have to go after him. The whole point of recruiting is to go after gun players, and Paul Hasleby is a gun. The odds of getting a better service from a player out of the draft are very slim.

The only concern is that he's struggled with fitness over the last couple of seasons. I think it may have even be the dreaded OP. They can't make a trade without checking if he's alright. He's similar to Ball in that he will try and play through anything. He's hardly missed any games since being drafted.

nicko016 · Post: # 449395Post **nicko016** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:32am

I'd be willing to offer him 250-300k per year preferably closer to 250k. I'd offer our secound round pick which they probably wouldn't accept but he doesn't seem to be on good terms with Freo. Maybe our third pick and a player. I'd definately enquire about him but wouldn't put all that much time into him. If we picked him up we would probably still wsnt to go after another quick midfelder and it would be hard to find a trade. We don't really have that many dispensible players with any weight for trade and we can't afford to trade away too many players.

battye · Post: # 449419Post **battye** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:50am

Don't underestimate Haselby. I'd be very happy to have him at St Kilda.

Saints Premiers 2008 · Tue 04 Sep 2007 1:05am

bungiton · Post: # 449436Post **bungiton** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 1:18am

Haselby is slow and has been battling back problems for the past two years

LennyBoy · Post: # 449469Post **LennyBoy** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 2:15am

We want pacey small ball winning midfielders, not middle aged reruits who are past there expiry. Brent Reillys, Chris Knights, Salopak's, Boak, Selwood, etc

Mr Magic · Post: # 449470Post **Mr Magic** » Tue 04 Sep 2007 2:19am

Who is worth paying $400k

How much do we reckon Dal's new contract is worth? 500k-600k?

If we use that as a basis for comparison, what would you pay for the names that are being thrown up?

redwhite&blackblood · Tue 04 Sep 2007 12:57pm

I wouldn't be worrying about players at other clubs until Sheldon has gotten off his butt and gets Goose and Kosi's signatures on the appropriate documents to keep them at the club for 3 years.

Not sure that HazelD would be our best pick up surely we need someone with more youth on their side!