APPEAL RESULT?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
hotdish
Club Player
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2006 7:14pm
Location: Canberra
Been thanked: 11 times

APPEAL RESULT?

Post: # 440137Post hotdish »

I've read on the news sites, on here and on Bigfooty - but i still can't find info on the appeal.

Surely it isn't still going?

I pressume they just dismissed it?


User avatar
Grimfang
Club Player
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:30am
Location: Tecoma, Vic.
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 440139Post Grimfang »

The appeal is on Thursday night at 5:30pm, Melbourne time.


Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons; for you are a quick and tasty morsel.
hotdish
Club Player
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2006 7:14pm
Location: Canberra
Been thanked: 11 times

Post: # 440141Post hotdish »

Grimfang wrote:The appeal is on Thursday night at 5:30pm, Melbourne time.
That would explain it then! :oops:

Thanks.


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7891
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 474 times

Post: # 440144Post Otiman »

With the result coinciding with the footy show, a co-incidence I think not!


User avatar
Saints94
SS Life Member
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed 31 Jan 2007 10:47am
Location: NSW
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Post: # 440189Post Saints94 »

Grimfang wrote:The appeal is on Thursday night at 5:30pm, Melbourne time.
i will be watching ten news at 5:40 :!:


User avatar
Dan Warna
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12846
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:56am
Location: melbourne

Post: # 440211Post Dan Warna »

it will probably take a couple of hours if they are fair dinkum or they want to fake being fair dinkum.

:lol:


Bewaire krime, da krimson bolt is comeing to yure nayborhood to smach krime

SHUT UP KRIME!
RooandKosi
Club Player
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon 12 Jul 2004 3:12pm

Post: # 440214Post RooandKosi »

Not a chance guys please dont get ya hopes up!!

This is ALL OUR fault... Baker dobbed HIMSELF in. All baker had to do was say he was looking at the ball and running towards the defense and theyd be NO 7 weeks.

Even Farmer said he didnt know what happened. It was ALL bakers evidence F***!!!!!

:evil:

Illegal bloke that broke the nose of Farmer how do we get round that???

:?:

I hope we do!! We need Baker is in top 10 IMPORTANT Players for US!!

Baker Off = Stkilda Win


User avatar
yipper
SS Life Member
Posts: 3967
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 8:18am
Location: Gippsland
Been thanked: 10 times

Post: # 440215Post yipper »

Bakes was told (correctly) to tell the truth. His testimony was corroborated by an independant witness - and that it was emphasised that NOTHING untoward had happened. It was an accidental clash of heads - that could not have possibly been forseen or expected under the circumstances.


I want to stand for something. I'm a loyal person and I think at the end of my career it will be great to look back and know that I'm a St Kilda person for life.
- Nick Riewoldt. May 19th 2009.
User avatar
Dan Warna
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12846
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:56am
Location: melbourne

Post: # 440219Post Dan Warna »

if everytime some one steps inside dal santo not only should dal get a free kick the person should get reported...

this suspension is a one off, and wont be replicated, because otherwise its the end of the game for ALL taggers/defenders.


Bewaire krime, da krimson bolt is comeing to yure nayborhood to smach krime

SHUT UP KRIME!
User avatar
riccardo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6952
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:44am
Location: Jason Gram - Michael Tuck Medalist 2008

Post: # 440222Post riccardo »

Brett Kirk would never be treated this way.

My conspiricy theory is to look at who we are playing this week. Who does Baker play on (and destroy) every time we play them? And who is the latest butt buddy of the AFL?

Makes sense, no?


Image

Image
RooandKosi
Club Player
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon 12 Jul 2004 3:12pm

Post: # 440230Post RooandKosi »

yipper wrote:Bakes was told (correctly) to tell the truth. His testimony was corroborated by an independant witness - and that it was emphasised that NOTHING untoward had happened. It was an accidental clash of heads - that could not have possibly been forseen or expected under the circumstances.
thats sounds great and hope that uis an outcome BUT baker said he BLOCKED Farmer which means he was focused on him and seen the ball was 50m away it was deemed illegal and SEEN farmer has broken his nose then Baker is guilty. Baker under NO circumstances should Baker have said I blocked Farmer what the hell was anyone thinking???? simply shouldve said I looking at the ball!!!!

GOD DAMN any hope of a flag goes with Baker!! :twisted:


Post Reply