Revoke Freo's AFL Licence

saintspremiers · Tue 21 Aug 2007 3:55pm

Enough is enough.

Freo just can't help themselves and DO NOT want to play the ball.

They ALWAYS play the man and it's not just against us, it's against most sides in the competition.

Time the other AFL clubs vote that their AFL operating licence is revoked and it's given to a new club that plays FAIR.

I'm sick of them, they've only been around since 1995 in the AFL and should earn respect from clubs that have a 100+ year history in the comp.

Quixote · Post: # 438307Post **Quixote** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 4:01pm

Dan Warna · Post: # 438311Post **Dan Warna** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 4:03pm

we are all angry but the fact is freo is protected.

I have hated freo for ages, ever since the screwed fabian francis.

you may or may not agree with me, but I reckon that carlton got hit hard for salary cap cheatiing, freo got a .... AN ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT OFFICER, for cheating in the salary cap by in excess of 1m.

they recruited farmer, francis, Bell (return to the club), Headland, Croad all on 500k p/a plus contracts...amongst other is about very short period of time.

the maths just doesn't add up.

the AFL cottoned onto this blatant stupidity (did they think 500k was the standard contract?) and merely provided 'administrative support' and made fabian francis sit out. Now in that year francis had his leg broken and freo didn't honor his contract.

absolute jokes.

riccardo · Post: # 438319Post **riccardo** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 4:14pm

I'd love to see them kicked out of the AFL.

Will never happen, sadly.

spert · Post: # 438328Post **spert** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 4:29pm

Freo will never succeed, why? because they have no b*#ls -they are weak of mind and body with no tradition of struggle and hardship.

Dan Warna · Post: # 438330Post **Dan Warna** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 4:34pm

spert wrote:Freo will never succeed, why? because they have no b*#ls -they are weak of mind and body with no tradition of struggle and hardship.

throw enough money and give them a soft enough draw and make conditions favourable enough and anyone can win.

maybe even engineer a quality coach for them.

Brisbane were a joke, lethal turned them around with a little salary cap help.

sydney were a joke, soft draw, money and a bit of team spirit, and amazing run with injuries, salary cap concessions turned them around.

joffaboy · Post: # 438332Post **joffaboy** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 4:39pm

Surely this is a joke thread.

Out of Freo and St.Kilda, I know who would have their licience revoked if it came to a choice.

9 Vic Clubs

2 Perth Clubs

You work it out

riccardo · Post: # 438334Post **riccardo** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 4:40pm

If they haven't kicked out the narcotic soaked, crime riddled mess that is Freos older brother, no other team would ever be booted.

Dan Warna · Post: # 438335Post **Dan Warna** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 4:43pm

joffaboy wrote:Surely this is a joke thread.

Out of Freo and St.Kilda, I know who would have their licience revoked if it came to a choice.

9 Vic Clubs

2 Perth Clubs

You work it out

yep, seems like only one interstate side is struggling to win a premiership in recent years...

meher baba · Post: # 438338Post **meher baba** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 4:47pm

joffaboy wrote:Surely this is a joke thread.

Out of Freo and St.Kilda, I know who would have their licience revoked if it came to a choice.

9 Vic Clubs

2 Perth Clubs

You work it out

I assume that you have unilaterally expelled Geelong from Victoria, JB.

Some would say that was a fair thing to do.

joffaboy · Post: # 438342Post **joffaboy** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 4:50pm

meher baba wrote:
joffaboy wrote:Surely this is a joke thread.

Out of Freo and St.Kilda, I know who would have their licience revoked if it came to a choice.

9 Vic Clubs

2 Perth Clubs

You work it out
I assume that you have unilaterally expelled Geelong from Victoria, JB.

Some would say that was a fair thing to do.

I try not to think about Geelong.

cowboy18 · Post: # 438378Post **cowboy18** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 6:01pm

On the upside at least we could get a decent opponent for rivalry round.

HSVKing · Post: # 438379Post **HSVKing** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 6:03pm

Quixote wrote:

Should that be WTTF???

(With that Thug Farmer)

plugger66 · Post: # 438393Post **plugger66** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 6:15pm

Kick everyone out. Lets just have the saints. Thats makes alot of sense.

cowboy18 · Post: # 438397Post **cowboy18** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 6:17pm

plugger66 wrote:Kick everyone out. Lets just have the saints. Thats makes alot of sense.

They would still pick on us.

st_Trav_ofWA · Tue 21 Aug 2007 6:17pm

plugger66 wrote:Kick everyone out. Lets just have the saints. Thats makes alot of sense.

would make makiing the 8 a heck of alot easier !!!

plugger66 · Post: # 438400Post **plugger66** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 6:19pm

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Kick everyone out. Lets just have the saints. Thats makes alot of sense.
would make makiing the 8 a heck of alot easier !!!

We would still win the GF by a point. Start the game no opposition. We miss from directly in front. Cannot play anymore as there is no one to kick out. Another GF by a point.

Brewer · Post: # 438403Post **Brewer** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 6:21pm

plugger66 wrote:We would still win the GF by a point. Start the game no opposition. We miss from directly in front. Cannot play anymore as there is no one to kick out. Another GF by a point.