Buckley INFERS "King Hit" !!

Eastern · Post: # 437670Post **Eastern** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:07pm

Nathan Buckley on SEN in the last hour infered that Jeff Farmer was "KING HIT". He went on to say that acts like that are much worse than what Johnson did to Bell.

They then read out that Johnson got 8 weeks, reduced to 6 with an early plea and that Rowe (Bris) got 1 week.

It was then that Buckley started BACK PEDALLING at 100mph. From what I heard, if I was in Bakes shoes I'd be investing a couple of hundred dollars with my lawyer. Who knows, it might pay a very handsome dividend.

Whether Buckley was trying to deflect attention away from Johnson was both irrelevant and clumsy. He has taken this whole incident to a completely different level, and it might end up costing him plenty !!

Otiman · Post: # 437679Post **Otiman** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:13pm

Certainly could be in trouble. Didn't directly say it, but certainly meant it when you look over the whole section of the broadcast.

bigred · Post: # 437681Post **bigred** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:15pm

Yeah I heard it all...

Feeble arguement from a feeble mind to be honest.

The Johnson determination came in and he was "defending" his player as much as he could without coming across as an even bigger asshat than he is.

He did say that Farmer was "king-hit" and that if it was the case, then it should be treated as a much worse incident than anything, even a high tackle or bump as it is not in general play...

Unless there is any video footage, incriminating Baker of any wrong doing, and no players come forward and deliberately put Baker in, then there is no way he will go for anything. The whole Voss idea is pathetic. I dare the AFL to introduce his testimony in any kind of hearing. He said on the broadcast that he "did not see it"...testimony over..

If Bakes did king hit Farmer behind play, then he should get weeks. No doubt about it in my mind. We dont need that level or lack of discipline from any player on our list, especially at this time of year.

Something about it makes me think that Baker has done nothing really wrong anyway. Just by the response that Lyon gave in his conference after the game..

Make no mistake though, he is being potted left, right and centre. Typical.

stinger · Post: # 437682Post **stinger** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:15pm

Eastern wrote:Nathan Buckley on SEN in the last hour infered that Jeff Farmer was "KING HIT". He went on to say that acts like that are much worse than what Johnson did to Bell.

They then read out that Johnson got 8 weeks, reduced to 6 with an early plea and that Rowe (Bris) got 1 week.

It was then that Buckley started BACK PEDALLING at 100mph. From what I heard, if I was in Bakes shoes I'd be investing a couple of hundred dollars with my lawyer. Who knows, it might pay a very handsome dividend.

Whether Buckley was trying to deflect attention away from Johnson was both irrelevant and clumsy. He has taken this whole incident to a completely different level, and it might end up costing him plenty !!

i will act for him for nothing.........

saintbrat · Post: # 437684Post **saintbrat** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:21pm

considering he was NO WHERE near Telstra Dome _Nor was his coach or team he would have NO IDEA
maybe if all the cameras hadn't been at Teac Filming him there may have been evidence

first time I have heard live crosses to the VFL - even when aaron and Gose where returning

Dan Warna · Post: # 437688Post **Dan Warna** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:23pm

they are assuming because of injury.

your honor I point to whelan v ball.

nothing to answer for according to the tribunal, ball suffered brain injuries, with an enlarged brain, internal bleeding and was effectively out for 5 weeks. (he did come back for one game but was in no condition to play)

FFS they can't protect ball being lined up with a 'fair bump' to the head and yet they are making assumptions about this shyte.

also your honor if they want to look at snipers have a look at the phukctards dudak and holland hang out with.

HarveysDeciple · Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:30pm

He must have been watching CSI Fremantle today to come to that conclusion.

After all their "experts" declared that the only way Farmer could have sustained that injury was becuase of some form of illegal action.....would very much like to know how that conclusion was reached.

matrix · Post: # 437701Post **matrix** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:42pm

bigred wrote:
He did say that Farmer was "king-hit" and that if it was the case,

if thats what he said then it doesnt make sense.

Farmer WAS king hit.......IF that is the case.....

was and if????

Post: # 437703Post **n1ck** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:44pm

matrixcutter wrote:
bigred wrote:
He did say that Farmer was "king-hit" and that if it was the case,
if thats what he said then it doesnt make sense.

Farmer WAS king hit.......IF that is the case.....

was and if????

obviously hes a mason, matrixcutter...

matrix · Post: # 437704Post **matrix** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:47pm

replies like that just make u look like u no nothing about anything.

looks like your programming is kicking in.
i comment on stuff i know about.....maybe u should stick to the same?

HSVKing · Post: # 437706Post **HSVKing** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:51pm

Ummmm... was he there to witness it???

Wasn't he playing for Williamstown on saturday???

Dan Warna · Post: # 437708Post **Dan Warna** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:55pm

the buckley sees all, the buckley knows all...

i think its fair enough to have him executed immediately on buckleys say so.

aussiejones · Mon 20 Aug 2007 6:58pm

Buckley was not there
Buckley was not there
Buckley was not there
Buckley was not there

Oh I forgot ........ he is an "expert"

Note to Bucks ... Keep your mouth shut !!

Mr Magic · Post: # 437721Post **Mr Magic** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 7:09pm

HarveysDeciple wrote:He must have been watching CSI Fremantle today to come to that conclusion.

After all their "experts" declared that the only way Farmer could have sustained that injury was becuase of some form of illegal action.....would very much like to know how that conclusion was reached.

They called in Grissom this morning and after releasing his 'flesh eating bugs' up Farmer's nostrils.

Grissom, who is under contract to Chairman Eddie's Feral Filth and had a laboratory at Lickar$e Centre, gave his verdict to Mathouse the Wise who passed it on to FIGJAM who then told us all on SEN this afternoon.

Apparently he reached his verdict because the 'flesh eating bugs' could find no trace of backbone or brain in Farmer and that was enough to convince Grissom that skullduggery had been performed on Farmer.

The full investigation was filmed by Geoff Slattery and will be avaiable on AFL.com tomorrow morning.

stinger · Post: # 437724Post **stinger** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 7:11pm

i thought mrs stevens was your typical "king hit"...........

bigred · Post: # 437750Post **bigred** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 8:05pm

matrixcutter wrote:
bigred wrote:
He did say that Farmer was "king-hit" and that if it was the case,
if thats what he said then it doesnt make sense.

Farmer WAS king hit.......IF that is the case.....

was and if????

Indeed.

Therein you will find his backpeddle.

Enjoy.

joffaboy · Post: # 437751Post **joffaboy** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 8:13pm

Noody knows what happened to Farmer, including Buckley. there was no footage.

However there was footage of Buckley smearing his blood all over Cameron Ling.

Now the blood rule was brought in because of blood born diseases and AIDS in particular.

Buckley could have endangered Lings life with his action, which we all saw, if he had some type of blood borne disease.

What right does a person who would do that, and get suspended for it, to pass judgement on something that he or nobody else saw?????

Who the F*** does this person of obvious low character, one who would deliberately smear his own blood on an opposition player, thik he is to proclaim that Farmer was "kinghit".

Sue the blood smearing gutless FIGJAM moron Bakes.

Farking idiot

SaintDippa · Post: # 437760Post **SaintDippa** » Mon 20 Aug 2007 8:26pm

Buckley would have to be kidding. Casting my mind back (twice, I think in 2001 and 2003?) wasn't he in a bit of trouble for smacking Andrew Thompson in the head from behind during a 'marking contest'. You know the type, player one arms extended out in front attempting a mark and his opponent trying to 'spoil' connects with the side of player 1's head.

Twice his 'exemplory' record stood him in good stead. ???

SideshowMilne · Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:52am

Bucks came on and straight away had a whinge about how the Collingwood player had been hung and quartered by public opinion (who all have by now seen it).

Five minutes pass and he says that the farmer incident was 10 times worse, and then admitted 5 minutes later that he hadn't seen it??

Sidenote how does the AFL sit with currently listed players passing judgement and influencing public opinion on pre tribunal cases?

Buckley and Voss have been very judgemental on Baker on radio.

Saints Premiers 2008 · Tue 21 Aug 2007 10:20am

buckley can go F*** himself...he is a piece of mumbling s***

goodie · Post: # 438191Post **goodie** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 11:39am

We already know Buckley isn't a brain surgeon, this is the same man who left Brisbane to chase a premiership. He promptly went to the Colliwobbles.

SaintHomer · Post: # 438268Post **SaintHomer** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 3:00pm

i already posted this on another thread, but i was listening to NOVA yesterday, and the farkwit buckley was likening the incident to the matthews/brus incident.

as far as a ready made coach, he has a long way to go IMO

QueenC · Post: # 438280Post **QueenC** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 3:24pm

Dan Warna wrote:the buckley sees all, the buckley knows all...

And everyone always seems to pay way too much attention

!!!

Buckley INFERS "King Hit" !!

Buckley INFERS "King Hit" !!

Re: Buckley INFERS "King Hit" !!