Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply

Should we have Re Signed Ratts when we did ?

yes we should have
8
18%
waited till seasons end
28
64%
would you have voted yes a month ago ?
1
2%
or not all and went for someone else
7
16%
 
Total votes: 44

User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12569
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 410 times
Been thanked: 1723 times

Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968907Post The Fireman »

we all know how this poll will go which makes you wonder about the people running the club.
You can say it's a hindsight thing but it would have been smarter and more cautious to have waited.
Last edited by The Fireman on Tue 19 Jul 2022 12:34pm, edited 1 time in total.


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6001
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 804 times
Been thanked: 938 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968908Post Vortex »

Moronic thread Fireman.

I'm not a lover or hater but this type of public discourse is less intelligent than tabloid.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16494
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3434 times
Been thanked: 2686 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968910Post skeptic »

May I suggest an edit…

Ask people how they would have voted a month ago


User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10236
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1290 times
Been thanked: 910 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968912Post asiu »

i was a yes voter

i appreciate ... at the target / congruency of decision making

this has the smell of double messaging from the coaching staff
(rattens resposibility)

the party boys or roboboys aspect i bang on about

i remember sitting with Barks at the Dome
... the pill went sideways to just forward of the wing
after the first bounce

we stopped ... what was the right thing to do again !!??

my pickup was that :
gt had succumbed to the 'we need to be defensive' mindset

and out of my mouth came ... "that will cost gt his job"


this current train wreck
reminds me of that experience


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7917
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1698 times
Been thanked: 789 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968915Post WellardSaint »

Vortex wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 10:27am Moronic thread Fireman.

I'm not a lover or hater but this type of public discourse is less intelligent than tabloid.
Scroll on then, champ 🤦‍♂️


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12569
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 410 times
Been thanked: 1723 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968927Post The Fireman »

Vortex wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 10:27am Moronic thread Fireman.

I'm not a lover or hater but this type of public discourse is less intelligent than tabloid.
never professed to be a smart man Vortex but thanks for your input

just getting the supporters take on it. as said..scroll on buddy


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12569
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 410 times
Been thanked: 1723 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968928Post The Fireman »

skeptic wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 10:34am May I suggest an edit…

Ask people how they would have voted a month ago
good idea...have edited


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6001
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 804 times
Been thanked: 938 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968929Post Vortex »

The Fireman wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 12:31pm
Vortex wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 10:27am Moronic thread Fireman.

I'm not a lover or hater but this type of public discourse is less intelligent than tabloid.
never professed to be a smart man Vortex but thanks for your input

just getting the supporters take on it. as said..scroll on buddy
Ironically you sook relentlessly about Sunnie Ernies post.

Clearly you admire him.


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12569
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 410 times
Been thanked: 1723 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968932Post The Fireman »

Vortex wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 12:38pm
The Fireman wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 12:31pm
Vortex wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 10:27am Moronic thread Fireman.

I'm not a lover or hater but this type of public discourse is less intelligent than tabloid.
never professed to be a smart man Vortex but thanks for your input

just getting the supporters take on it. as said..scroll on buddy
Ironically you sook relentlessly about Sunnie Ernies post.

Clearly you admire him.
sorry I don't understand the connection ?


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6001
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 804 times
Been thanked: 938 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968933Post Vortex »

The Fireman wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 12:40pm
Vortex wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 12:38pm
The Fireman wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 12:31pm
Vortex wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 10:27am Moronic thread Fireman.

I'm not a lover or hater but this type of public discourse is less intelligent than tabloid.
never professed to be a smart man Vortex but thanks for your input

just getting the supporters take on it. as said..scroll on buddy
Ironically you sook relentlessly about Sunnie Ernies post.

Clearly you admire him.
sorry I don't understand the connection ?
Maybe wait for Sunny to start his next thread after our next loss asking for peiple to cast votes on whether we should we delist our top 3 players and see if you can connect the dots.


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12569
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 410 times
Been thanked: 1723 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968936Post The Fireman »

Vortex wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 12:47pm
The Fireman wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 12:40pm
Vortex wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 12:38pm
The Fireman wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 12:31pm
Vortex wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 10:27am Moronic thread Fireman.

I'm not a lover or hater but this type of public discourse is less intelligent than tabloid.
never professed to be a smart man Vortex but thanks for your input

just getting the supporters take on it. as said..scroll on buddy
Ironically you sook relentlessly about Sunnie Ernies post.

Clearly you admire him.
sorry I don't understand the connection ?
Maybe wait for Sunny to start his next thread after our next loss asking for peiple to cast votes on whether we should we delist our top 3 players and see if you can connect the dots.
oh ok I see where you are coming from, It was actually someone elses idea which i thought was a good idea and acted on ....my complaints about ernies posts are more about the rubbish he puts out there but if you are comparing me with him then I have totally
misjudged you.
With all due respect i thought you were smarter than that.


SAINT-LEE
Club Player
Posts: 1091
Joined: Fri 22 Mar 2019 10:46pm
Has thanked: 483 times
Been thanked: 363 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968948Post SAINT-LEE »

There is numerous different coaching styles and techniques, however the three main styles are authoritarian, democratic and laissez-faire.

As a highly successful coach of elite athletes Kevin Sheedy believes that he has always been an ‘Authoritarian’ coach. He believes that ‘the most important influence as a coach is respect and obtaining the true potential of every player‘ in order to do this he takes great pride in developing each player as an individual stating that ‘praise was always awarded when it was deserved, but criticism was always given when it was necessary.’ He knows and understands not only what it takes to be a successful coach but what it takes for his athletes to succeed, having coached over 389 winning games as well as Essendon Football Club to 4 Premierships. Sheedy takes great pride in is effective approach to coaching AFL as an Authoritarian coach.


AUTHORITARIAN: This style of coaching allows for the coach to be entirely in charge and in control, making all of the decisions. An ‘authoritarian’ coach is a coach that demands respect from the athletes at all times. When things are going well and an athlete and or the team are performing up to the coaches expected standard the coach will not hesitate to complement and acknowledge their performance, however when they are losing or making avoidable and unnecessary mistakes they will not refuse to hold back on the harsh criticism and no feelings are taken into consideration with punishments set in place. They are most beneficial as a coach for elite level athletes and adults.

DEMOCRATIC: A style of coaching that works in cooperation with the athletes, always taking into account their ideas before making a final decision. They form positive guidance for their athletes. They are not as strong minded as an ‘authoritarian coach’ but will provide athletes with constructive criticism when it is necessary and offers praise and encouragement when athletes are performing successfully. This style of coaching is successful on athletes that are inexperienced or beginners.

LAISSEZ-FAIRE: Known as a very casual style of coaching, they are often disorganised in running trainings, making very few decisions in regards to the athlete, offering them plenty of space and freedom to make their own personal decisions. They do not have a large expectation of the athlete to perform and are not very critical or complimentary towards the athletes’ performance, whether it be good or bad. Overall they are very relaxed and easy going as coaches and often it is up to the athlete in regards to whether they want to succeed or not. A coaching style that works best on outgoing personalities as well as younger children.


This last one is our coach and it's NOT WORKING.
It actually can and has worked but the tram and culture has to be perfect.

We need an AUTHORITARIAN.
The issue is most are arseh@les.

Grant was...an authoritarian AND an asshole.

Sheedy, Matthews, Clarkson, Lyon....legendary authoritarianism.

Choco is an example ...I know I know him well but it doesn't detract from his prowess and my desire to get him on board.


Sheedy says a winning team has an Authoritarian Senior with the other two styles as assistants. It's a perfect mix.

We keep making assistants like Richo...classic democratic...or Ratten...laissez-faire..into seniors and it doesn't work


User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5705
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 567 times
Been thanked: 426 times
Contact:

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968950Post samoht »

We could've just appointed Steele, Sinclair, Membrey and Wilkes as our co-playing coaches.

Done/tried something different.... even for a year.

We always blame/scapegoat the coaches ... that's the St Kilda DNA through and through....so why not make them redundant, even if it's for one season to see what happens?


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18367
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1485 times
Been thanked: 1850 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968952Post SaintPav »

No I wouldn’t have signed him but it’s hindsight bias.

I was neutral/agnostic about the extension, slightly leaning on a wait and see approach.

IMO, Ratts doesn’t sound any better or worse than any other coach in his pressers.

On field has obviously been horrid since the bye.

I think the entire club needs to take a long hard look at itself and figure out what it stands for because there is a lot of messaging which the players can’t back up. It’s embarrassing.

Signing Ratten up after we had stitched up a finals berth would have been ‘best practice’ but in life and across most fields we rarely ever get best practice solutions to real world problems. This is because decision makers are typically:

Unelected
Unaccountable
Incompetent

But then again, I’m just a “cook” so what would I know.

:D


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4383
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1217 times
Been thanked: 1266 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968969Post Yorkeys »

We so wanted him to be a good coach. As soon as green shoots showed we presold the harvest and took out a big mortgage. Oops.

Its always thus, you badly want something so you see/hear only what supports your view.

So difficult when reality does not match up. As so often happens.

I don't really blame the Club but am disappointed there were not senior people that urged a precautionary approach, even a performance clause that 2 years was conditional on a '22 finals appearance.

See after all ,and what ever they are paid, senior managements' judgements are not much better than ours even with inside info and the benefit of recent history. You see, its other people's money.

Hope Brett can pull something out of his coaching magic hat and prove me wrong and the StK management geniuses.


bangaulegend
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2490
Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968984Post bangaulegend »

I was one who was against signing Ratt's before the end of the season because I actually thought he was out of ideas when we were challenged . Sure the list, injuries & the draw haven't helped but I don't think Ratt's is the man to lead us to glory , nice bloke but not sure has what it takes to get us to the level required to even challenge for a flag nether lone win one . I hope he proves me wrong


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1968997Post Wayne42 »

David Noble tried his hand at being an Authoritarian, then had to get up and apologise to his minions, or so the media keeps telling us.

Does the old authoritarian coaching style still work with today's younger people ?


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7991
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 124 times
Been thanked: 1092 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1969014Post Devilhead »

I was always wait until season end ..... with a preference to looking elsewhere anyway

As pointed out numerous tines a burst of 20 min football does not maketh a full 4 quarters of match domination

The powers that be fell for the ole ladder position trick rather than looking at the full picture

I guess now we wait and see whether Ratts and the playing group can turn it around


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10282
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3250 times
Been thanked: 2206 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1969016Post Scollop »

I voted yes because I believe Ratts is doing a good job with what he inherited….



……plus, I voted yes because…..











…….






There’s an option that was left out and I think it would have got Top Votes for your question Firey

Who gives a ratts tossbag!!

Op does smell a bit like a SE thread. I admire people like Teflon who are relentless with their posts and discussions looking for solutions. This thread does not
Last edited by Scollop on Tue 19 Jul 2022 9:42pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12569
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 410 times
Been thanked: 1723 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1969017Post The Fireman »

Scollop wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 9:35pm I voted yes because I believe Ratts is doing a good job with what he inherited….



……plus, I voted yes because…..











…….






There’s an option that was left out and I think it would have got Top Votes for your question Firey

Who gives a ratts tossbag!!

Op does smell a bit like a SE thread
Are you referring to the coaches scrotum ?


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10282
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3250 times
Been thanked: 2206 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1969018Post Scollop »

What are your thoughts for fixing our problems? Thinking about castrating someone or blaming someone or sacking someone now that the decision is done is pointless


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12569
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 410 times
Been thanked: 1723 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1969019Post The Fireman »

Scollop wrote: Tue 19 Jul 2022 9:44pm What are your thoughts for fixing our problems? Thinking about castrating someone or blaming someone or sacking someone now that the decision is done is pointless
Me ? I’m not sure on how to fix the problems I was simply putting a poll up to see what people thought about the signing of the coach at that point in time
it’s questioning the thought process of the people in charge more than anything
Don’t you think these questions should be asked or discussed?
You are happy with the way the club is handling things good on you


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10282
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3250 times
Been thanked: 2206 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1969024Post Scollop »

Hindsight is a wonderful thing. My opinion was locked in after 2020.

I think based on 2020 and based on output in the latter part of 2021, I would have signed him on at the start of season 2022 and given him 3 extra. Imagine how wet the twats of fans would have been with an 8-3 start?

The club in any case, had only given Ratts the two year extension.

Anyhoo….like your thread for the vote on Saints AFLW, you’re really just gauging fan thoughts aren’t you? You don’t have an opinion do you?


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12569
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 410 times
Been thanked: 1723 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1969026Post The Fireman »

Yeah I think you can see my opinion in the original post
I think the club should’ve waited regardless of hindsight

But yeah I’m engaging fans thoughts. I’ve got yours that’s great


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10282
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3250 times
Been thanked: 2206 times

Re: Should we have Re Signed Ratt when we did ?

Post: # 1969044Post Scollop »

Just saw the other thread that prompted you to start this poll. I understand why you did it now, but once again, I believe we have a very good coach.

Ratts is not perfect, but he has the experience to know what it takes for a successful footy environment. We need to put the foundations in place and you can’t expect to sprinkle some magic dust and recruit a few ready made players and expect to become an instant premiership contender*

I am optimistic that there could be a day that this club starts getting all the cogs in place to set us up for a tilt at another flag. I am optimistic that Ratts may be able to convince some of the non-footballing types who call the shots to play the long game and not just try and take short cuts

* I reserve the right to change my mind if we can get Amon, Tarranto and DeGoey to the club in 2023 :wink:


Post Reply