Bad kicking is bad football.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22487
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8408 times
- Been thanked: 3720 times
Bad kicking is bad football.
Old saying but still true today.
Crow lice coach reckons that his side should have won.
Interesting comment seeing that the saints won three of the four quarters.
Crow lice coach reckons that his side should have won.
Interesting comment seeing that the saints won three of the four quarters.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10631
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 792 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
Nicks making excuses for his own failure as a coach.
He had a quality player, publicly humiliated the player by releasing a video of the incident with Nicks bagging the player.
In the video he invited the player to leave.
And the player did.
Nicks only got a second round compensation pick for that player.
St Kilda got that player for free (restricted fee agent).
That player was a key reason why St Kilda won.
Nicks got nicks.
Crouch got a club that values him.
He had a quality player, publicly humiliated the player by releasing a video of the incident with Nicks bagging the player.
In the video he invited the player to leave.
And the player did.
Nicks only got a second round compensation pick for that player.
St Kilda got that player for free (restricted fee agent).
That player was a key reason why St Kilda won.
Nicks got nicks.
Crouch got a club that values him.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1077 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
The reality is if they kick straight they probably do win - but like our Port game we kicked 18 behinds, you dont win games kicking like that.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18367
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1485 times
- Been thanked: 1850 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
We got the Port game back.
Even if 4 of those shots were gOals instead of p0ints Matthew Dicks still loses by a pOint.
What are ya gonna do?!
Even if 4 of those shots were gOals instead of p0ints Matthew Dicks still loses by a pOint.
What are ya gonna do?!
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6069
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1556 times
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18367
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1485 times
- Been thanked: 1850 times
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7917
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1698 times
- Been thanked: 789 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
Their defender who went to King was hopelessly undersized and too short.
They didn't implement correct negating tactics on Max. This is Max's 3rd season so they have plenty of video to trawl through.
They didn't kick straight.
That's 3 reasons there
They didn't implement correct negating tactics on Max. This is Max's 3rd season so they have plenty of video to trawl through.
They didn't kick straight.
That's 3 reasons there
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13080
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1279 times
- Been thanked: 1949 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
Usually we lose games because of bad kicking, nice to win one for a change.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7917
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1698 times
- Been thanked: 789 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
A Port game in 2017 when Acres had a chance to put us in front.
Geelong last year when Snags got 1.6 (or was that the Swans game?)
Lots more.
I won't mention the one where the cleverest small fwd in history, misjudged the bounce of the ball.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3250 times
- Been thanked: 2206 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
He’s full of shizen and making excuses. Come to think of it…. I reckon the second quarter was crucial to us winning the game. Although we lost it on the scoreboard, we softened them up and played some tough unrelenting football.
No one can predict outcomes. Whenever a goal is scored, you get a centre bounce and it’s a reset.
We clearly had the advantage in the ruck so perhaps we would have had more chances for quick kicks out of centre clearance and more situations like the last five minutes.
Our fitness shone through. No point leading for 1900 metres in the Cox Plate if you can’t get the business done in the last 100m. We didn’t win by a nose…we were a length and half clear at the post!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22487
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8408 times
- Been thanked: 3720 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
WellardSaint wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 6:14pmA Port game in 2017 when Acres had a chance to put us in front.
Geelong last year when Snags got 1.6 (or was that the Swans game?)
Lots more.
I won't mention the one where the cleverest small fwd in history, misjudged the bounce of the ball.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18367
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1485 times
- Been thanked: 1850 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
We played some unsociable football in the third, Jimmy Webster’s hit on Lachie Murphy for instance.Scollop wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 6:52pmHe’s full of shizen and making excuses. Come to think of it…. I reckon the second quarter was crucial to us winning the game. Although we lost it on the scoreboard, we softened them up and played some tough unrelenting football.
No one can predict outcomes. Whenever a goal is scored, you get a centre bounce and it’s a reset.
We clearly had the advantage in the ruck so perhaps we would have had more chances for quick kicks out of centre clearance and more situations like the last five minutes.
Our fitness shone through. No point leading for 1900 metres in the Cox Plate if you can’t get the business done in the last 100m. We didn’t win by a nose…we were a length and half clear at the post!
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22487
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8408 times
- Been thanked: 3720 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
Good. We are regarded as too nice.SaintPav wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 7:13pmWe played some unsociable football in the third, Jimmy Webster’s hit on Lachie Murphy for instance.Scollop wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 6:52pmHe’s full of shizen and making excuses. Come to think of it…. I reckon the second quarter was crucial to us winning the game. Although we lost it on the scoreboard, we softened them up and played some tough unrelenting football.
No one can predict outcomes. Whenever a goal is scored, you get a centre bounce and it’s a reset.
We clearly had the advantage in the ruck so perhaps we would have had more chances for quick kicks out of centre clearance and more situations like the last five minutes.
Our fitness shone through. No point leading for 1900 metres in the Cox Plate if you can’t get the business done in the last 100m. We didn’t win by a nose…we were a length and half clear at the post!
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18367
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1485 times
- Been thanked: 1850 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
Being nice is overrated.saynta wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 7:16pmGood. We are regarded as too nice.SaintPav wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 7:13pmWe played some unsociable football in the third, Jimmy Webster’s hit on Lachie Murphy for instance.Scollop wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 6:52pmHe’s full of shizen and making excuses. Come to think of it…. I reckon the second quarter was crucial to us winning the game. Although we lost it on the scoreboard, we softened them up and played some tough unrelenting football.
No one can predict outcomes. Whenever a goal is scored, you get a centre bounce and it’s a reset.
We clearly had the advantage in the ruck so perhaps we would have had more chances for quick kicks out of centre clearance and more situations like the last five minutes.
Our fitness shone through. No point leading for 1900 metres in the Cox Plate if you can’t get the business done in the last 100m. We didn’t win by a nose…we were a length and half clear at the post!
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6069
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1556 times
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5997
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 229 times
- Been thanked: 1028 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
And pulling away!Scollop wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 6:52pmHe’s full of shizen and making excuses. Come to think of it…. I reckon the second quarter was crucial to us winning the game. Although we lost it on the scoreboard, we softened them up and played some tough unrelenting football.
No one can predict outcomes. Whenever a goal is scored, you get a centre bounce and it’s a reset.
We clearly had the advantage in the ruck so perhaps we would have had more chances for quick kicks out of centre clearance and more situations like the last five minutes.
Our fitness shone through. No point leading for 1900 metres in the Cox Plate if you can’t get the business done in the last 100m. We didn’t win by a nose…we were a length and half clear at the post!
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
Crow lice coach is right. Just like we should have beaten Port!!!
St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!
NeXus
NeXus
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1223
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 570 times
- Been thanked: 109 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
What a load of rubbish,game against Port was a lottery,but the game against the crows we deserved to win & did!SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 8:37pmCrow lice coach is right. Just like we should have beaten Port!!!
PADDLEPOP1000
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
If the crows had kicked accurately in the first half we would have lost!!!PADDLEPOP1001 wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 9:42pmWhat a load of rubbish,game against Port was a lottery,but the game against the crows we deserved to win & did!SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 8:37pmCrow lice coach is right. Just like we should have beaten Port!!!
St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!
NeXus
NeXus
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6069
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1556 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
Nah. We'd have kicked 4 more in the 3rd.SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 10:15pmIf the crows had kicked accurately in the first half we would have lost!!!PADDLEPOP1001 wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 9:42pmWhat a load of rubbish,game against Port was a lottery,but the game against the crows we deserved to win & did!SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 8:37pmCrow lice coach is right. Just like we should have beaten Port!!!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
!!!CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 10:17pmNah. We'd have kicked 4 more in the 3rd.SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 10:15pmIf the crows had kicked accurately in the first half we would have lost!!!PADDLEPOP1001 wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 9:42pmWhat a load of rubbish,game against Port was a lottery,but the game against the crows we deserved to win & did!SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 8:37pmCrow lice coach is right. Just like we should have beaten Port!!!
St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!
NeXus
NeXus
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3250 times
- Been thanked: 2206 times
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6931
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 427 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
Let's not kid ourselves, Saturday night was one of our worst performances of the year. Many of our players were well off their best form, although some (eg, Sinclair) improved as the match went on.
We came good in the last quarter but we were extremely lucky not to be a lot further behind. We were undermanned in the middle: Sinclair is not the answer there. We were largely ineffective at keeping the ball inside our forward 50: we desperately need Butler back, although I am told (I didn't have time to watch the game) that he looked out somewhat of form on Sunday.
The high free kick count against us didn't help. Unlike others, I thought most of the high tackle ones were there: it's a very fine line between a player leading with his head (which is not a free kick) and bending as low as he can to avoid being tackled. Adelaide have clearly practiced this tactic a great deal. I think it's rather futile, in that they'd be better off trying to clear the ball from congested areas rather than take it into tackles all the time: not all umpires are going to blow the whistle for them as often as occurred on Saturday night.
Their problem is that they are slower at moving the ball around that most other teams, which is something they will need to address if they want to improve.
Anyway, I saw it as one of those bad performances which still result in a win. We don't manage enough of those, so it was great!
We came good in the last quarter but we were extremely lucky not to be a lot further behind. We were undermanned in the middle: Sinclair is not the answer there. We were largely ineffective at keeping the ball inside our forward 50: we desperately need Butler back, although I am told (I didn't have time to watch the game) that he looked out somewhat of form on Sunday.
The high free kick count against us didn't help. Unlike others, I thought most of the high tackle ones were there: it's a very fine line between a player leading with his head (which is not a free kick) and bending as low as he can to avoid being tackled. Adelaide have clearly practiced this tactic a great deal. I think it's rather futile, in that they'd be better off trying to clear the ball from congested areas rather than take it into tackles all the time: not all umpires are going to blow the whistle for them as often as occurred on Saturday night.
Their problem is that they are slower at moving the ball around that most other teams, which is something they will need to address if they want to improve.
Anyway, I saw it as one of those bad performances which still result in a win. We don't manage enough of those, so it was great!
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 10:15pmIf the crows had kicked accurately in the first half we would have lost!!!PADDLEPOP1001 wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 9:42pmWhat a load of rubbish,game against Port was a lottery,but the game against the crows we deserved to win & did!SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 8:37pmCrow lice coach is right. Just like we should have beaten Port!!!
Yeah yeah woulda, coulda, shoulda. Worst argument for a loss ever. At end of the day (night) they bloody didnt!!
We've been on the other side of those matches plenty over the years. Nice to be on the right side of the ledger for a change.
Bad kicking is bad football.
End of discussion.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22487
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8408 times
- Been thanked: 3720 times
Re: Bad kicking is bad football.
Wot I said.stkfc1 wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 8:54pmSunnyErnie wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 10:15pmIf the crows had kicked accurately in the first half we would have lost!!!PADDLEPOP1001 wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 9:42pmWhat a load of rubbish,game against Port was a lottery,but the game against the crows we deserved to win & did!SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Mon 23 May 2022 8:37pmCrow lice coach is right. Just like we should have beaten Port!!!
Yeah yeah woulda, coulda, shoulda. Worst argument for a loss ever. At end of the day (night) they bloody didnt!!
We've been on the other side of those matches plenty over the years. Nice to be on the right side of the ledger for a change.
Bad kicking is bad football.
End of discussion.