Frees for and against.

[Sainter_Dad]

Umpires looking after us AGAIN!?!

Can we kill off the ‘umpires always screw us’ myth yet??

BTW, didn’t see anyone blowing their lid with King’s ‘Hawkins push’ in the goal square in the second!

And so it continues - scab picking

[saynta]

Saints v Filth 18 for....25 against. 17 point loss

Saints v Shockers 24 for....27 against. 10 point win.

Saints v Tigers 27 for .....19 against. 33 point win.

Saints v Hawks 27 for .......25 against. 69 point win.

Saints v Suns 18 for ......15 against. 26 point win

Saints v Giants 21 for ......26 against. 17 point win

[Ghost Like]

We are missing the Hawthorn game.

[saynta]

We are missing the Hawthorn game.

Fixed.

[mr six o'clock]

In last night's game we had 11 frees one minute into the second quarter including some very soft ones . Feels weird when we get those , however normal service was resumed as we only received 10 more frees for the rest of the match.

[Freebird]

Watching bulldogs and the love umps have for them...why are they continually receiving soft frees but appear to get away with a lot....

50/50s generally in their favour

[StPeter]

Watching bulldogs and the love umps have for them...why are they continually receiving soft frees but appear to get away with a lot....

50/50s generally in their favour

Watching Bulldogs v Adelaide and incredibly lop-sided free count in the Bulldogs favour. (24-10)

This has been going on now for several years. Why?

[Life Long Saint]

Watching bulldogs and the love umps have for them...why are they continually receiving soft frees but appear to get away with a lot....

50/50s generally in their favour

Watching Bulldogs v Adelaide and incredibly lop-sided free count in the Bulldogs favour.

This has been going on now for several years. Why?

24-10 Dogs way.
Even with an extra 3 players on the ground, they couldn't beat the Crows.

[Ghost Like]

Watching bulldogs and the love umps have for them...why are they continually receiving soft frees but appear to get away with a lot....

50/50s generally in their favour

Watching Bulldogs v Adelaide and incredibly lop-sided free count in the Bulldogs favour.

This has been going on now for several years. Why?

24-10 Dogs way.
Even with an extra 3 players on the ground, they couldn't beat the Crows.

One point, the perfect margin!

[saynta]

Saints v Filth 18 for....25 against. 17 point loss

Saints v Shockers 24 for....27 against. 10 point win.

Saints v Tigers 27 for .....19 against. 33 point win.

Saints v Hawks 27 for .......25 against. 69 point win.

Saints v Suns 18 for ......15 against. 26 point win

Saints v Giants 21 for ......26 against. 17 point win

Saints v Port 26 for ........20 against. 1 point loss

[Sainter_Dad]

Opposition	Frees For	Frees Against	Result
Collingwood	18	25	Loss - 17
Fremantle	25	27	Win - 10
Richmond	27	19	Win - 33
Hawthorn	27	25	Win - 69
Gold Coast	18	15	Win - 26
Greater Western Sydney	21	26	Win - 17
Port Adelaide	26	20	Loss - 1
.	_____	_____
Total	162	157

[The_Dud]

The first 7 frees for the game (plus a 50m penalty) going our way was interesting, lucky it wasn't the reverse or this place might have burnt down!

[D.B.Cooper]

The first 7 frees for the game (plus a 50m penalty) going our way was interesting, lucky it wasn't the reverse or this place might have burnt down!

Didn't you know the umpires blatantly cheated PA to victory on Saturday evening?

[The_Dud]

The first 7 frees for the game (plus a 50m penalty) going our way was interesting, lucky it wasn't the reverse or this place might have burnt down!

Didn't you know the umpires blatantly cheated PA to victory on Saturday evening?

Yep. The onfield mic's picked up them yelling "chewy on ya boot!" every time we were lining up for goal!

Despicable.

[saynta]

Not even remotely funny.

[CURLY]

Not even remotely funny.

Given the only 50 that resulted in a goal went there way. Still a 50 no one knows why it was awarded.

[D.B.Cooper]

Not even remotely funny.

Given the only 50 that resulted in a goal went there way. Still a 50 no one knows why it was awarded.

Because we are in positive territory in free kicks received and you can no longer bitch and moan over the inequity of the total numbers, you are reverting to specific decisions that may or may not have gone against us.

Do straws and clutching mean anything to ya Curly?

Was that 50 blatant cheating Curly?
Was it part of the AFL conspiracy to keep the saints downtrodden?

[CURLY]

Not even remotely funny.

Given the only 50 that resulted in a goal went there way. Still a 50 no one knows why it was awarded.

Because we are in positive territory in free kicks received and you can no longer bitch and moan over the inequity of the total numbers, you are reverting to specific decisions that may or may not have gone against us.

Do straws and clutching mean anything to ya Curly?

Was that 50 blatant cheating Curly?
Was it part of the AFL conspiracy to keep the saints downtrodden?

Terrible call and gifted them a goal. Call it what you want.

[maverick]

Not even remotely funny.

Given the only 50 that resulted in a goal went there way. Still a 50 no one knows why it was awarded.

Because we are in positive territory in free kicks received and you can no longer bitch and moan over the inequity of the total numbers, you are reverting to specific decisions that may or may not have gone against us.

Do straws and clutching mean anything to ya Curly?

Was that 50 blatant cheating Curly?
Was it part of the AFL conspiracy to keep the saints downtrodden?

Terrible call and gifted them a goal. Call it what you want.

What was the 50 for?
It should be explained, it can’t be for jack running through
I have read it could be dissent, but from where, it was a mark??

[The_Dud]

Not even remotely funny.

Given the only 50 that resulted in a goal went there way. Still a 50 no one knows why it was awarded.

Not sure if this is blatant lying or just plain stupidity?

How did King kick his first goal amid our 7-0 free kick count to start the game..?

[The_Dud]

Not even remotely funny.

Given the only 50 that resulted in a goal went there way. Still a 50 no one knows why it was awarded.

Because we are in positive territory in free kicks received and you can no longer bitch and moan over the inequity of the total numbers, you are reverting to specific decisions that may or may not have gone against us.

Do straws and clutching mean anything to ya Curly?

Was that 50 blatant cheating Curly?
Was it part of the AFL conspiracy to keep the saints downtrodden?

Terrible call and gifted them a goal. Call it what you want.

What was the 50 for?
It should be explained, it can’t be for jack running through
I have read it could be dissent, but from where, it was a mark??

That’s on the broadcaster for their shoddy coverage.

[CURLY]

Not even remotely funny.

Given the only 50 that resulted in a goal went there way. Still a 50 no one knows why it was awarded.

Not sure if this is blatant lying or just plain stupidity?

How did King kick his first goal amid our 7-0 free kick count to start the game..?

King was 15 out directly in front hardly a gift.

[CURLY]

Not even remotely funny.

Given the only 50 that resulted in a goal went there way. Still a 50 no one knows why it was awarded.

Because we are in positive territory in free kicks received and you can no longer bitch and moan over the inequity of the total numbers, you are reverting to specific decisions that may or may not have gone against us.

Do straws and clutching mean anything to ya Curly?

Was that 50 blatant cheating Curly?
Was it part of the AFL conspiracy to keep the saints downtrodden?

Terrible call and gifted them a goal. Call it what you want.

What was the 50 for?
It should be explained, it can’t be for jack running through
I have read it could be dissent, but from where, it was a mark??

That’s on the broadcaster for their shoddy coverage.

No it’s not. They couldn’t work out what it was for. No one knows.

[The_Dud]

Not even remotely funny.

Given the only 50 that resulted in a goal went there way. Still a 50 no one knows why it was awarded.

Not sure if this is blatant lying or just plain stupidity?

How did King kick his first goal amid our 7-0 free kick count to start the game..?

King was 15 out directly in front hardly a gift.

Lol, like all the other sitters he nailed…

So was it lying or stupidity, I’d love to know?

[CURLY]

Not even remotely funny.

Given the only 50 that resulted in a goal went there way. Still a 50 no one knows why it was awarded.

Not sure if this is blatant lying or just plain stupidity?

How did King kick his first goal amid our 7-0 free kick count to start the game..?

King was 15 out directly in front hardly a gift.

Lol, like all the other sitters he nailed…

So was it lying or stupidity, I’d love to know?

Giving a 50 to a bloke at the top of the goal square is hardly a gift. On the flip side awarding a 50 which still no one knows what for 70 out is a gift.