Ben King

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5699
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 767 times
Been thanked: 739 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909698Post samuraisaint »

SaintPav wrote: Sat 19 Jun 2021 9:01pm While we’re shopping, we might as well try and get Collins. This would free up Howard a bit.
Great post - Collins is THE single most underrated full back in the entire AFL roster.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10222
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3236 times
Been thanked: 2196 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909701Post Scollop »

Maybe we’ve been going about this the wrong way. Just give Bing’s dad a job at the club and we’ve got him!!

And while we’re at it, give Anderson’s dad the CEO role and land Noah as well.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16485
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3430 times
Been thanked: 2685 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909716Post skeptic »

samuraisaint wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 9:47am
SaintPav wrote: Sat 19 Jun 2021 9:01pm While we’re shopping, we might as well try and get Collins. This would free up Howard a bit.
Great post - Collins is THE single most underrated full back in the entire AFL roster.
100% agree

Reckon Howard would be well suited to more of a CHB type role with an ability to zone off and push up the ground, whilst leaving a more accountable defender deep


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10651
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2356 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909734Post B.M »

Yes, Howard might be better suited to CHB (position doesn’t really exist) but Wilkie is playing the 2nd tall defender role atm


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16485
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3430 times
Been thanked: 2685 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909735Post skeptic »

B.M wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 3:19pm Yes, Howard might be better suited to CHB (position doesn’t really exist) but Wilkie is playing the 2nd tall defender role atm
True enough but we’re talking about roles here. We’re pbly short a decent tight checking defender and Wilkie is versatile enough to go from 2nd tall to 3rd or medium sized defender


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10651
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2356 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909736Post B.M »

I think we are happy to go undersized, which I think is an error.

Happy for Howard 199 to play on Gorillas and Wilkie 191 to play taller than his height. Maybe looking at Highmore 192 to play as a 3

Maybe we want a more mobile backline?

Runs the risk of being exposed imo


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6534
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5775 times
Been thanked: 1901 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909737Post Ghost Like »

skeptic wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 3:25pm
B.M wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 3:19pm Yes, Howard might be better suited to CHB (position doesn’t really exist) but Wilkie is playing the 2nd tall defender role atm
True enough but we’re talking about roles here. We’re pbly short a decent tight checking defender and Wilkie is versatile enough to go from 2nd tall to 3rd or medium sized defender
I don't care which part of the backline Howard plays, FB, CHB, 1st tall, 2nd tall, fly half as long as he doesn't take the kick ins. He's been too indecisive often leading to a long bomb or worse, a straight turnover.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22619
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 696 times
Been thanked: 1639 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909738Post Teflon »

skeptic wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 1:08pm
samuraisaint wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 9:47am
SaintPav wrote: Sat 19 Jun 2021 9:01pm While we’re shopping, we might as well try and get Collins. This would free up Howard a bit.
Great post - Collins is THE single most underrated full back in the entire AFL roster.
100% agree

Reckon Howard would be well suited to more of a CHB type role with an ability to zone off and push up the ground, whilst leaving a more accountable defender deep
Great call re Howard - could be a really versatile attacking chb he’s not a dour close checking defender never has been.
If we can support him with a decent sized stay home defender with Wilkie/Highmore support roles we start to become very strong down back imo


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5982
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 1023 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909743Post Sainter_Dad »

Devilhead wrote: Sat 19 Jun 2021 9:52pm Rowell & Anderson might want to come home to the bayside :twisted:
Dean might have a say on Noah too - maybe warning him off :wink:


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909744Post Wayne42 »

The Recruit wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 1:46am Compo pick for billings goes to suns
Dunstan
Our 3rd rnd 2021

so picks
6, Dunstan and 40
You won't get it done with that offer, they won't want our rejects for their best forward.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22619
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 696 times
Been thanked: 1639 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909780Post Teflon »

Let’s get Ben and insist he’s a winger...we are good at that


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1077 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909791Post Impatient Sainter »

Teflon wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 7:55pm Let’s get Ben and insist he’s a winger...we are good at that
Yeah it really worries me that Ratts is insistent he can turn Battle into a wingman. I thought Ratts was a pretty smart coach, but I'm really having my reservations now.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16485
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3430 times
Been thanked: 2685 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909794Post skeptic »

Yeah there’s something about Ratts that is just peculiar.

He has these odd takes that he just perseveres with for reasons that are not obviously clear.

Last year it was taking our exceptionally well performing backline and inexplicably dropping Carlisle for weeks whilst we were winning games. IIRC we went into games a key defender short and lost the majority whilst he was out

Then there was playing Kent as a forward pocket that didn’t kick goals and moved up the ground to get 6-7 touches a game
And whilst Hind could only play in a FP, Kent had a solid run up forward kicking what was it? 3 goals on 3 months. That particular call has aged especially poorly

This year it’s been 3 small forwards (he loves small forwards) Battle on a wing and Long+Bytel as the big scape goats

There’s something about him that’s just odd


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909795Post Wayne42 »

skeptic wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 10:13pm Yeah there’s something about Ratts that is just peculiar.

He has these odd takes that he just perseveres with for reasons that are not obviously clear.

Last year it was taking our exceptionally well performing backline and inexplicably dropping Carlisle for weeks whilst we were winning games. IIRC we went into games a key defender short and lost the majority whilst he was out

Then there was playing Kent as a forward pocket that didn’t kick goals and moved up the ground to get 6-7 touches a game
And whilst Hind could only play in a FP, Kent had a solid run up forward kicking what was it? 3 goals on 3 months. That particular call has aged especially poorly

This year it’s been 3 small forwards (he loves small forwards) Battle on a wing and Long+Bytel as the big scape goats

There’s something about him that’s just odd
Ratts might have passed his use by date, his thinking might belong to yesteryear.

I don't believe Ratts has it all his own way at the Saints, i think he has to contend with Rath's theories as well as his own.
That's something i picked up on in their member's meeting the other day. Maybe there is a bit of conflict there.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10651
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2356 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909796Post B.M »

Is it Rath who is to blame?

The other day it was the assistants??

We really don’t want it to be Ratten do we?


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909799Post Wayne42 »

B.M wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 11:01pm Is it Rath who is to blame?

The other day it was the assistants??

We really don’t want it to be Ratten do we?
Beware the gripes of Rath
Last edited by Wayne42 on Mon 21 Jun 2021 7:41am, edited 1 time in total.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22619
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 696 times
Been thanked: 1639 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909801Post Teflon »

skeptic wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 10:13pm Yeah there’s something about Ratts that is just peculiar.

He has these odd takes that he just perseveres with for reasons that are not obviously clear.

Last year it was taking our exceptionally well performing backline and inexplicably dropping Carlisle for weeks whilst we were winning games. IIRC we went into games a key defender short and lost the majority whilst he was out

Then there was playing Kent as a forward pocket that didn’t kick goals and moved up the ground to get 6-7 touches a game
And whilst Hind could only play in a FP, Kent had a solid run up forward kicking what was it? 3 goals on 3 months. That particular call has aged especially poorly

This year it’s been 3 small forwards (he loves small forwards) Battle on a wing and Long+Bytel as the big scape goats

There’s something about him that’s just odd
Whatever peculiarities he’s got 1 year for mine.
Get a CONSISTENT defensive game going Brett, no more hiding behind “player effort” it’s YOUR job to get that each week.
I’m Not sure all players have brought into Bretts game plan..I’m not sure he commands their respect...sometimes a coach has to have some mongrel to bring that about abs I don’t think Brett has any....
1 year and IF Finnis signs him Rd 2 for another 3 I’ll spew up


“Yeah….nah””
Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5942
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 803 times
Been thanked: 934 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909810Post Vortex »

Can we afford Ben King, I would have thought our finances are stretched quite low.


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6069
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 1556 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909811Post CQ SAINT »

Vortex wrote: Mon 21 Jun 2021 9:09am Can we afford Ben King, I would have thought our finances are stretched quite low.
I figure people are suggesting that offloading Billlings or Ross would balance the ledger. Problem then being replacing some dead weight with no good picks to replace them.
So, We would have to hope the GCFC would take 2023 FRDP and a player. Its a very long shot.
2022 FRDP and Billings, if he chooses to go and gets paid well, may get us a good compo pick. Also a long shot, but if they lose B.King the can afford it.


User avatar
SaintDippa
Club Player
Posts: 836
Joined: Sun 20 Aug 2006 10:28pm
Location: Mean Streets of Ringwood North
Has thanked: 177 times
Been thanked: 111 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909818Post SaintDippa »

The way we're travelling we could have pick 1 in the 2022 uncontracted players draft and get Ben for nothing.


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12510
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 399 times
Been thanked: 1719 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909824Post The Fireman »

SaintDippa wrote: Mon 21 Jun 2021 11:20am The way we're travelling we could have pick 1 in the 2022 uncontracted players draft and get Ben for nothing.
must be the plan, too hard to explain our present position otherwise.


sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909830Post sunsaint »

Wayne42 wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 4:35pm
The Recruit wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 1:46am Compo pick for billings goes to suns
Dunstan
Our 3rd rnd 2021

so picks
6, Dunstan and 40
You won't get it done with that offer, they won't want our rejects for their best forward.
what if we throw in DH as well - isnt he a great influence on & OFF the field - the suns would love that
if wage comes up tell em will do a % split


Seeya
*************
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909831Post Wayne42 »

sunsaint wrote: Mon 21 Jun 2021 6:47pm
Wayne42 wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 4:35pm
The Recruit wrote: Sun 20 Jun 2021 1:46am Compo pick for billings goes to suns
Dunstan
Our 3rd rnd 2021

so picks
6, Dunstan and 40
You won't get it done with that offer, they won't want our rejects for their best forward.
what if we throw in DH as well - isnt he a great influence on & OFF the field - the suns would love that
if wage comes up tell em will do a % split
One of the main problems with the Gold Coast Suns is their senior players, those with 100 plus games, are shite players, spuds.

It would be ludicrous for the Suns to trade Bing and accept another batch of Spuds from the Saints in return for their best forward.

I doubt Tony Cochrane would approve any of these proposed trades, either would the AFL, who are the Suns biggest Sponsor. :lol:


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4343
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1213 times
Been thanked: 1263 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909839Post Yorkeys »

We can get Ben if he really wants us and no other club. Otherwise we can't pay enough - and retain whatever little credibility we have left.

I'd go the line that his mental health will suffer terribly if he can't play in same side as Max, and separately Lindsay Fox promises him a job for life post footy managing Avalon Complex as a world class airport and quarantine facility.


vacuous space
SS Life Member
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 162 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1909847Post vacuous space »

I'm just going to point out that Bailey Smith is struggling to get midfield time, even with Dunkley and Treloar injured. That might be a better tree to shake.


Yeah nah pleasing positive
Post Reply