Hickey, Bruce and Hind

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10406
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2316 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1900256Post B.M »

At that stage, Longer was clearly a better ruckman at stoppage.

Average footballer though


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7641
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 187 times
Been thanked: 528 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1900263Post magnifisaint »

They're all average.


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16407
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3394 times
Been thanked: 2655 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1900267Post skeptic »

I think few would argue that for the most part, Longer was better at the tap outs.

The problem is that that’s all Longer could do.

Richo seemed to really value that but IMO for all the criticism he copped, GT was on point on that one: a ruck that was just competitive at taps and contributes nothing else (and no blocks aren’t enough) is worthless.
Generally not regarded as one of the game’s most brilliant minds... GT figured that out like 18 years ago


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18162
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1457 times
Been thanked: 1829 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1900282Post SaintPav »

skeptic wrote: Sat 08 May 2021 1:40pm I think few would argue that for the most part, Longer was better at the tap outs.

The problem is that that’s all Longer could do.

Richo seemed to really value that but IMO for all the criticism he copped, GT was on point on that one: a ruck that was just competitive at taps and contributes nothing else (and no blocks aren’t enough) is worthless.
Generally not regarded as one of the game’s most brilliant minds... GT figured that out like 18 years ago
What explains Noble then?

I always thought that Grant was spinning the value of the position (in response to a media question) because we didn't have a very good one. I think they call that a Sun Tzu maneuver.

Also, we were so close to getting Cox, weren't we? Puts to bed the theory that he didn't value quality ruckman.

and how's this for irony:

We are about to get Cox but West Coast says no deal after Gardner does his knee. May have cost us a flag or 2. A few years later, Gradner is recruited to the club and gets injured in a Grand Final!

Only St Kilda.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16407
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3394 times
Been thanked: 2655 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1900348Post skeptic »

SaintPav wrote: Sat 08 May 2021 2:38pm
skeptic wrote: Sat 08 May 2021 1:40pm I think few would argue that for the most part, Longer was better at the tap outs.

The problem is that that’s all Longer could do.

Richo seemed to really value that but IMO for all the criticism he copped, GT was on point on that one: a ruck that was just competitive at taps and contributes nothing else (and no blocks aren’t enough) is worthless.
Generally not regarded as one of the game’s most brilliant minds... GT figured that out like 18 years ago
What explains Noble then?

I always thought that Grant was spinning the value of the position (in response to a media question) because we didn't have a very good one. I think they call that a Sun Tzu maneuver.

Also, we were so close to getting Cox, weren't we? Puts to bed the theory that he didn't value quality ruckman.

and how's this for irony:

We are about to get Cox but West Coast says no deal after Gardner does his knee. May have cost us a flag or 2. A few years later, Gradner is recruited to the club and gets injured in a Grand Final!

Only St Kilda.
Indeed.

I think Trent Knobel was recruited as a back up originally and they thought he had a bit of potential to improve. IIRC correctly he towelled you Spider one day though Everite was a bit crook on the day.

Then all of a sudden Trent was the only ruck in the list (once Brooks went down). I noted that they didn’t try too hard to keep him after 04 when he pushed for a big pay rise

The story about Cox has been out for a while and just breaks the heart. Definitely cost us flags


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5681
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 762 times
Been thanked: 734 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902254Post samuraisaint »

https://www.afl.com.au/news/613096/slow ... -past-pies

Read this before we scapegoat players. How handy would Hickey be for us over the next month?


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9240
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 129 times
Been thanked: 1162 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902258Post CURLY »

samuraisaint wrote: Sat 15 May 2021 11:06pm https://www.afl.com.au/news/613096/slow ... -past-pies

Read this before we scapegoat players. How handy would Hickey be for us over the next month?
What do we do with him the rest of the time?


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5681
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 762 times
Been thanked: 734 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902284Post samuraisaint »

CURLY wrote: Sat 15 May 2021 11:40pm
samuraisaint wrote: Sat 15 May 2021 11:06pm https://www.afl.com.au/news/613096/slow ... -past-pies

Read this before we scapegoat players. How handy would Hickey be for us over the next month?
What do we do with him the rest of the time?
well. he'd be in our best 22 wouldn;t he?


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
takeaway
Club Player
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 368 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902285Post takeaway »

samuraisaint wrote: Sun 16 May 2021 9:38am
CURLY wrote: Sat 15 May 2021 11:40pm
samuraisaint wrote: Sat 15 May 2021 11:06pm https://www.afl.com.au/news/613096/slow ... -past-pies

Read this before we scapegoat players. How handy would Hickey be for us over the next month?
What do we do with him the rest of the time?
well. he'd be in our best 22 wouldn;t he?
Yep, he'd be No.3 ruck at St Kilda. In 22 with Marshall injured. Better than Hunter/Alabaskis. What's your point?


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5681
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 762 times
Been thanked: 734 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902323Post samuraisaint »

takeaway wrote: Sun 16 May 2021 10:11am
samuraisaint wrote: Sun 16 May 2021 9:38am
CURLY wrote: Sat 15 May 2021 11:40pm
samuraisaint wrote: Sat 15 May 2021 11:06pm https://www.afl.com.au/news/613096/slow ... -past-pies

Read this before we scapegoat players. How handy would Hickey be for us over the next month?
What do we do with him the rest of the time?
well. he'd be in our best 22 wouldn;t he?
Yep, he'd be No.3 ruck at St Kilda. In 22 with Marshall injured. Better than Hunter/Alabaskis. What's your point?
No, he'd be the Number 1 or 2 ruckman for us - and he'd be in our best 22 regardless of our injuries. He was best on ground for the Swans yesterday.
I am just a mug punter who follows the Saints, so have no knowledge about pro sports, or even amateur sports tbh, but my point is that I think our development at our club (and as members it is our club) needs to get better.

We clear players to other teams who are then managed better. I don't see it as always being recruitment but rather about developing the players we have.

We would have won Friday night with Hickey there, and with Bruce in the side. We were clearly the better team for much of the night. So why were they traded out? It couldn't have been about money because we have paid plenty to bring others to the club.

There seems to be some conjecture about whether we should be sending RoMa off to have surgery according to the media reports. Apart from him missing 4-6 games, the surgery is a bit of a risk. So why are we doing it?

I'm questioning how we build the capacity of the players we currently have.

Also; as an aside, I would play Longy up forward, and I would not be playing him as a sub either. A sub is supposed to give you fresh legs if you get an injury during a match.

I want St Kilda to be ahead of the curve, not following the herd.

Evidence of our ability to develop players will be on display Saturday night against the 'Dogs. We have a good recent record against them - in direct contrast with our records against Geelong, Port Adelaide, and Essendon - so we should be able to clearly see how we cover our injuries. Do we make the hard decision to play Alabakis for the block of matches RoMa is out? He's been on the list a while. Why not? He's a ruckman after all? 4-6 matches will give the club a chance to see how he goes against the top shelf.

The bottom line is, if we can't cover our injuries against a side we compete well against, then it really is a question of our depth. BUT, if we beat the 'Dogs, then last season is an accurate indicator of our trajectory up the ladder.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
takeaway
Club Player
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 368 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902338Post takeaway »

samuraisaint wrote: Sun 16 May 2021 1:01pm
takeaway wrote: Sun 16 May 2021 10:11am
samuraisaint wrote: Sun 16 May 2021 9:38am
CURLY wrote: Sat 15 May 2021 11:40pm
samuraisaint wrote: Sat 15 May 2021 11:06pm https://www.afl.com.au/news/613096/slow ... -past-pies

Read this before we scapegoat players. How handy would Hickey be for us over the next month?
What do we do with him the rest of the time?
well. he'd be in our best 22 wouldn;t he?
Yep, he'd be No.3 ruck at St Kilda. In 22 with Marshall injured. Better than Hunter/Alabaskis. What's your point?
No, he'd be the Number 1 or 2 ruckman for us - and he'd be in our best 22 regardless of our injuries. He was best on ground for the Swans yesterday.
I am just a mug punter who follows the Saints, so have no knowledge about pro sports, or even amateur sports tbh, but my point is that I think our development at our club (and as members it is our club) needs to get better.

We clear players to other teams who are then managed better. I don't see it as always being recruitment but rather about developing the players we have.

We would have won Friday night with Hickey there, and with Bruce in the side. We were clearly the better team for much of the night. So why were they traded out? It couldn't have been about money because we have paid plenty to bring others to the club.

There seems to be some conjecture about whether we should be sending RoMa off to have surgery according to the media reports. Apart from him missing 4-6 games, the surgery is a bit of a risk. So why are we doing it?

I'm questioning how we build the capacity of the players we currently have.

Also; as an aside, I would play Longy up forward, and I would not be playing him as a sub either. A sub is supposed to give you fresh legs if you get an injury during a match.

I want St Kilda to be ahead of the curve, not following the herd.

Evidence of our ability to develop players will be on display Saturday night against the 'Dogs. We have a good recent record against them - in direct contrast with our records against Geelong, Port Adelaide, and Essendon - so we should be able to clearly see how we cover our injuries. Do we make the hard decision to play Alabakis for the block of matches RoMa is out? He's been on the list a while. Why not? He's a ruckman after all? 4-6 matches will give the club a chance to see how he goes against the top shelf.

The bottom line is, if we can't cover our injuries against a side we compete well against, then it really is a question of our depth. BUT, if we beat the 'Dogs, then last season is an accurate indicator of our trajectory up the ladder.
You'd prefer Hickey over Ryder and/or Marshall? Not for me. Long up forward? No thanks.

We would have won Friday night if we had kicked reasonably straight.

I totally disagree with your comments, not sure what curve you are planning to put the Saints ahead on.


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5681
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 762 times
Been thanked: 734 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902340Post samuraisaint »

Fair enough, that's your opinion. I am just musing about some of the players we have traded out and questioned the wisdom of it. Some of those players are excellent talents and exactly the type of player we do need. I mean we really needed a Bruce in the side Friday night to take some of the pressure off our forwards. Geelong wouldn't have been able to contain him, for example.

RE: Curve - I meant that I would like St Kilda to be ahead of the curve by being innovative (think Pagan's paddock/Clarko's cage/Lyon's Frontal pressue) rather than reacting to what others are doing. St Kilda often play to the script (i.e. our capitulation to Essendon in Round 3) and rarely surprise the oppostion/footy world. Last year we did show a bit of that innovation, and our final win was a minor upset and that does give me hope for 2021.

I think if our player development is sound, we'll bounce back and beat the 'Dogs on Saturday night, as we will have been developing the depth in our reserves which can adequately compensate the half dozen or so injuries that we have, and that when players return from injury/reserves come into the side, they can combine with the team competently. Our endeavor on Friday night was really good and we can build on that.

If we fail to turn up on Saturday night though, due to RoMa's injury, then that is a different story and speaks to the club's ability to develop the capacity of the players we have on the list.
EDIT: we have the second least injuries in the league - the Dogs have close to the most! No excuses boys!

Sure I probably need to let this go, but I don't want us to waste this year. There are still thirteen matches to go.
If we win Saturday night rest assured I will not be adding any posts to this topic anymore.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7213
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 134 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902397Post chook23 »

Hind had a another very very good game today


saint4life
Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4236
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1193 times
Been thanked: 1239 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902403Post Yorkeys »

and Acres?


User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5957
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 352 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902428Post MC Gusto »

Of the 3 Hind is the f-up we made
Bruce we got reasonable return on. What did that pick between us? Dougie? I can’t quite remember but we got a reasonable return
Hickey similar and you got to remember he was a witches hat at west coast. Great for the guy he’s found form with the swans - I always liked him but really should be considered the eagles loss not ours
Hind is smashing it and is exactly what we need. Bombers have been repaid on Milne…we have lost out on him big time


#1 Ryder fan
Viscount Jeremiah
Club Player
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed 23 May 2018 12:51pm
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 100 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902431Post Viscount Jeremiah »

f****** love to ask Ratten why we never gave Hind a go at HBF

31 touches last night averaging 26 for the year and beating his opponent most weeks


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902439Post Joffa Burns »

MC Gusto wrote: Mon 17 May 2021 9:30am Of the 3 Hind is the f-up we made
Bruce we got reasonable return on. What did that pick between us? Dougie? I can’t quite remember but we got a reasonable return
Hickey similar and you got to remember he was a witches hat at west coast. Great for the guy he’s found form with the swans - I always liked him but really should be considered the eagles loss not ours
Hind is smashing it and is exactly what we need. Bombers have been repaid on Milne…we have lost out on him big time
Bruce pick got Jones with some later swaps as well.
Hickey pick got Hannebery with a shuffle.

To be fair I thought Hind was average at Saints but he is playing bloody good football at the moment.
Defending and beating his man and providing run and good foot skills off half back.

Was just about BOG this week from what I saw (on TV) of that match.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5957
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 710 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902487Post shanegrambeau »

Mathew Lloyd said of Hind today,

"As good as Adam Saad, on half the money. Would easily be in the top 5 B & F at Essendon this year."

Woah...don't it make ya feel good?

Especially with Butler, Lonie and Higgins spinning their wheels.

Lucky Newnes was dropped for yesterday's game.

...and i might add, our woes with Long and across half-back in general.


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10022
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3176 times
Been thanked: 2149 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902547Post Scollop »

shanegrambeau wrote: Mon 17 May 2021 2:38pm Mathew Lloyd said of Hind today,

"As good as Adam Saad, on half the money. Would easily be in the top 5 B & F at Essendon this year."

Woah...don't it make ya feel good?

Especially with Butler, Lonie and Higgins spinning their wheels.

Lucky Newnes was dropped for yesterday's game.

...and i might add, our woes with Long and across half-back in general.
I’m watching AFL 360

Slobbo must have heard Matthew earlier today because he just about repeated everything that Lloydy said and he added that...

Nick Hind is a close second to being the recruit of the year. He said that at this stage it would probably be Tom Hickey :shock: :cry:


User avatar
bigred
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11463
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902550Post bigred »

Always thought Hickey had the most upside.
Was the better footballer over Billy. Much better.

It was a curious decision to move him on over Longer.
Perhaps the penny finally dropped for him at Sydney, or perhaps the environment just suits him.
Who knows? A couple of clubs have moved him on, perhaps he had issues with his prep or work rate.


"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18162
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1457 times
Been thanked: 1829 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902552Post SaintPav »

I thought we had enough HBF.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5681
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 762 times
Been thanked: 734 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902563Post samuraisaint »

Scollop wrote: Mon 17 May 2021 8:39pm
shanegrambeau wrote: Mon 17 May 2021 2:38pm Mathew Lloyd said of Hind today,

"As good as Adam Saad, on half the money. Would easily be in the top 5 B & F at Essendon this year."

Woah...don't it make ya feel good?

Especially with Butler, Lonie and Higgins spinning their wheels.

Lucky Newnes was dropped for yesterday's game.

...and i might add, our woes with Long and across half-back in general.
I’m watching AFL 360

Slobbo must have heard Matthew earlier today because he just about repeated everything that Lloydy said and he added that...

Nick Hind is a close second to being the recruit of the year. He said that at this stage it would probably be Tom Hickey :shock: :cry:
I knew this was going to be the case in Round 3 -

"How terrible is wisdom when it brings no fortune to the wise"

Robert De Niro as El Diablo in Angel Heart (1987).


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4236
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1193 times
Been thanked: 1239 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902567Post Yorkeys »

Who would have thought Coffield and Long would be so bad this year, they - our brains trust - just thought Hind was surplus to requirements given also that DMac was contracted and Jimmy the W was coming back. Essendon seem to have more bigger players than us (who doesn't) so Hind gets more protection blocking for his runs. Good coaching, shrewd recruitment.

If we needed another painful reminder of ARs limitations as a coach see T. Hickey's current form, and some good games for WCE it should be noted, and how J. Bruce has developed. Seriously wonder about our CEO's understanding of football - remember he renewed AR. Expensive, but its other peoples money and emotions.

Possible lesson: if another club wants one of our players and the recruiting team think it is a good deal take it, stop and get expert outside advice about what you are missing, what's the catch.


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6521
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5775 times
Been thanked: 1898 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902570Post Ghost Like »

Yorkeys wrote: Tue 18 May 2021 1:07am Who would have thought Coffield and Long would be so bad this year, they - our brains trust - just thought Hind was surplus to requirements given also that DMac was contracted and Jimmy the W was coming back. Essendon seem to have more bigger players than us (who doesn't) so Hind gets more protection blocking for his runs. Good coaching, shrewd recruitment.

If we needed another painful reminder of ARs limitations as a coach see T. Hickey's current form, and some good games for WCE it should be noted, and how J. Bruce has developed. Seriously wonder about our CEO's understanding of football - remember he renewed AR. Expensive, but its other peoples money and emotions.

Possible lesson: if another club wants one of our players and the recruiting team think it is a good deal take it, stop and get expert outside advice about what you are missing, what's the catch.
All well said Yorkeys & great paragraphing.

I'm not sure we need to be beating ourselves up over these three. There's a very good reason this thread wasn't created last season, they were all terrible & one was still playing for us, albeit in the wrong position.

Hickey & Bruce have finally pulled their digits out. It's amazing what a person on a last chance can achieve, rather than having it easy with wind being blown up their clackers.

I'm also just as confident if Marshall, Ryder and Paton had been available all season...no one would really be giving a fat rat's.

What's interesting about Coffield is that he's a required and definite best 22. I think it's good Ratts won't tolerate average form from him. A bit different with what has been tolerated with in the past. Can only be good in the long run.


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5681
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 762 times
Been thanked: 734 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1902639Post samuraisaint »

It's called depth, and good sides have it.

We shouldn't be on the ropes because of half a dozen injuries.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
Post Reply