This is the best Collingwood counselling service Ive heard of yet. :lol: But cheers man you rock!!........and if a heavy breather rings and calls himself Rodger...be very afraid.....he may start with the line "have you checked the children Johnpeter........." You bleed the red, white black...

the first action to be taken would be to pyss off our legal dropkicks...the easiest case in the history of footy to get off yet our so called highly qualified legal eagles hand baker with a 7 match ban...dropkicks no point going any further with this ....hope to christ butterss is kicking a few ars...

Snakeman66 wrote:Who were the morons tonight to decide this?

good question - who are these twits?

something has to be done - it wouldnt happen if it was Collingwood and there was no evidence dont worry bout that.

Our club is being rooted because we are seen as easy targets who roll over over - NO MORE. Cmon St Kilda off to court we go...

yep we have to look at legal action - even injunction for Friday this is just rubbish

7 weeks NO evidence?

Im prepared to cop 10 extra on the membership for it also.

oh f@rkon BS.

THATS F@RKED \.

7 WEAKS NO EVIDENCE?

Your a f@rkon disgrace Demetriou.

I think the same grama - to rule him out for ANY weeks with no evidence on some bulshyte wording is typical but stupid.

Theyll probably change the result by sticking a 1 in front of the 7.

b@stards.

Id expect wed be sensible with what we offer...Kosi's first near full year in a few seasons and hes been solid without setting the world on fire across the whole yer so far. Id also like to think that the club has backed Kosi and put a lot of time and effort into him and that in itself would transl...

By the rules of the AFL he didn't nothing wrong and by the rules of the tribuneral he can't get suspended for it seeing as there is no evidence, he will get off! Blocking off the ball is an offence worthy of a free kick. Being held responsible because a player runs into the back of your head whilst...

Id expect wed be sensible with what we offer...Kosi's first near full year in a few seasons and hes been solid without setting the world on fire across the whole yer so far. Id also like to think that the club has backed Kosi and put a lot of time and effort into him and that in itself would transla...

Go Ferg - big wrap for this bloke

Really hope he turns in a good one.

As great as Thommo has been for the club he shouldnt play against the Tigers ubless he deserves a game or we are out of the finals race. Very harsh I know but the finals is more important than anything. not for sentimental value but if bakes is going to be gone for the remainder of the year maybe t...

Ferguson and talk of delisting him are silly.

Watch him Friday IF he plays and see for yourself.

This guy has what it takes to make it - another Sam Fisher for mine...very steady and capable of playing forward or back.

JeffDunne wrote:I think I'm going to vomit.

cheers bigfella.

Spelly still reads. A handful of posters that still post are responsible for chasing away some of the best contributors here. Pity that those responsible couldn't have been chased away first. I miss Moose too. I agree Jeff wholeheartedly. Whats worse is when these same protagonists then feign indig...

plugger66 wrote:Ferg will play as will hopefully Kosi and maybe Attard or CJ. Prbably Attard with bakes.

Good stuff - sounds good.

Ferg willdo the job nicely me thinks.

L. Fisher would be my first choice on Le Cras.. Would bring Attard in in Bake's is rubbed out, and use him through the midfield... Alternatively, with Kerr out for sure and marbe no Cousins and Judd, we may not tag at all, and just try to dominate all stoppages.. Ferg maybe for Max.. I'd prefer Gwi...

[quote="OnTheFence"]Straight from the AFL Tribunal's own handbook, with situation applicable to Baker's actions highlighted. 1.2 Other bumps to the head or neck A number of submissions on this subject supported a stronger stance against head-high bumps and clarification of what constitutes...

hard to not agree with all of that- my sentiments also.

The (W)AFL have handed down this decision because if they didn't they'd be highlighting their incompetence. After all that has happened in football is recent years it is staggering to think that any incident could escape video footage. The (W)AFL had two choices : - pander to public outrage over a ...

saintdooley wrote:no appeal

What do you mean no appeal?


Thats just utter cr2p if the club takes that line.

oh thats just even worse.....yes yes we believe you Steven....but we are gonna have to give you 7??

THERES NOT FRICKEN EVIDENCE OTHER BIASED WITNESS FFS!

Stick with the process that got you there in the first place. Each year we picked up a slightly more mature player or two who would be able to push for selection a little sooner: 2001: Black, Knobel 2002: Brooks, Penny, Powell 2003: Gram, Guerra, Sam Fisher 2004: Ackland, McGough, Fiora 2005: Watts...

stinger wrote:ho...hum.....

Come on Rumpy lets have ya!!!

Get in there and offer those conveyancing services to the club....