n1ck wrote:I read that our QC was looking at bringing in evidence from the Kosi / Gia clash to support Bakes...

As I said earlier I wonder about our legal team. No point in bringing that up because the AFL changed the rules and said at the start of the year what Gia did wouldnt be allowed this year.

Well the scummy AFL has just blocked Farmers letter! :evil: The Saints lawyers should have known you cannot bring in new evidence at the appeal. I really do onder if we get the best legal advise. But this is absurd, because without new evidence we were unable to lodge an appeal??? Isn't this what e...

St. Luke wrote:Well the scummy AFL has just blocked Farmers letter!

The Saints lawyers should have known you cannot bring in new evidence at the appeal. I really do onder if we get the best legal advise.

Outs at the moment will be Harvs and Max and ins will be Ferg and Kosi. Bakes will be named but I dont think he has any chance of winning the appeal so he should be replaced by Attard.

As great as Thommo has been for the club he shouldnt play against the Tigers ubless he deserves a game or we are out of the finals race. Very harsh I know but the finals is more important than anything.

homework wrote:at least harvs dal or gilbert toal disgrace

Why would any of them get in AA squad. Only chance would be Rooy and Chips.

I cannot see Gwilt on Lynch..or Hansen My guess is that Goose will take big Q and Chips will take Hansen. Don't worry too much about Hansen's height. He's primarily a leading forward. He's got good speed and good hands, but he doesn't use his size particularly well. Fisher should play him the same ...

I thought everyone was having a go at me over my opinions last night. What relief.

Ferg will play as will hopefully Kosi and maybe Attard or CJ. Prbably Attard with bakes.

Guys, this is a warning. Stop the baiting please. If you disagree with someone, attack their view, not their person. why we copped it all night from plugger66 about how holier then thou he was because he believed in the process and those who disagreed lacked brains..... I want to hear him now, was ...

Starting to get nervous. taking a long tome if evidence was in favour of Bakes.

So plugger, you hapy with the process here or not? Interested to know... I dont care how long it takes as long as they get the right answer which I hope will be not guilty. I dont see what they have done so wrong. they havent interviewed all the witness but the cops dont either in a court case. The...

Oh When the Saints wrote:

Iceman234 wrote:
Did you just delete joffaboy's response?

PS nice political sig.

I edited a couple of responses and deleted on each of joffaboy's and plugger66's ...

Obviously you're not a Keating fan ...

Why did you get rid of mine. Some of my best work.

joffaboy wrote: Fair enough. Just dont like vieled threats.

Stil no news on the Baker tribunal incident.

No threat at all from me.


mods: And that will do please guys ...

Nothing more than another AFL circus led by Dimwit and his ape side kick Ando Are they at the tribunal. Did they do the investigation. No and no. Lets wait and see what happens. who cares how long it goes for. And people saying why did it even go to the tribunal does every police case that goes to ...

Nothing more than another AFL circus led by Dimwit and his ape side kick Ando Are they at the tribunal. Did they do the investigation. No and no. Lets wait and see what happens. who cares how long it goes for. And people saying why did it even go to the tribunal does every police case that goes to ...

Too bad they didn't do anything when 1) Lenny was thrown into a fence and broke his arm 2) Riewoldt was throat punched 3) Riewoldt was bumped twice on his broken collarbone 4)Kosi got his skull fractured 5) Luke Ball got his face smashed in but wait...... they are Saints players so who cares????? 1...

Kick everyone out. Lets just have the saints. Thats makes alot of sense. would make makiing the 8 a heck of alot easier !!! :lol: We would still win the GF by a point. Start the game no opposition. We miss from directly in front. Cannot play anymore as there is no one to kick out. Another GF by a p...

Kick everyone out. Lets just have the saints. Thats makes alot of sense.

Go Sretnias Go wrote:Come on Stinger, a little more than ho, hum

Is there a case of defamation against Buckley for his comments on SEN yesterday, and
As the case against Bakes will be tossed out, does Bakes have a defamation case against the AFL???

No and no.

Spinner wrote:Awsome find SaintBrat!!!!!

Made me have a look myself.......and found the below.....


Most users ever online was 244 on Tue 12 Sep 2006 4:47pm



What happened that doy for so many to be on this site????

Bet B4E and Teffers were on line that day.

Yes if we have some good legal work. I do not for one minute subscribe to the theory we get a raw deal at the tribunal or anywhere else in the AFL. That is just emotional rubbish. hayes getting thrown into the fence up at the gabba, dal elbowed in the head by lloyd, maguire getting hit in the guts ...

So are you saying the Club are ok about Bakes being cited Plugger? Are they confident of justice being seen to be done like it always is in games against Freo? I honestly think he must be towing some sort of party line tonight. You can't trust the AFL as far as you'd like to kick them on this or vi...

awesome effort Pat.....we are all right behind you on this one. F*** the AFL F*** Demetriou and Anderscum. They are a bunch of a**holes that always let their own pissy pathetic agendas get in the way of the truth. How DARE THEY treat OUR club with such disrespect YET AGAIN. Come on here Demetriou i...

That is why it is going to the tribunal. We will see the evidence and if he didnt do anything he will get off. Fair enough, nice to see that you have faith in the process. Do you think that he will get off if the evidence consists of 1 freo official saying he saw Baker hit Farmer ? If that is all t...