Rosco wrote:

plugger66 wrote:

magnifisaint wrote:Agreed, but what is this Parish guy like?

Chicken.

Parish is like a pick before ours.

Alright then. Fish.

SainterK wrote:Oh dear.

Least you didn't go a servo souva with extra hand hair.

11th, just not convinced...yet.

Well that's bloody disappointing and neither am I but when you just about play every game you would hope better than that. Unfortunately KFC was shut. Two large Grand Angus meals is doing the trick.

In one way the top 5 is all a bit sad. Pretty much expected if you watched the games without looking for mistakes as the first thing you look at. Sad but expected? How so? Sad because the top 5 are already aging. Even the top 10 only has about 3 players under 25. Sad cause you weren't there this ye...

skeptic wrote:Not bad for the worst player of all time

Dud.

magnifisaint wrote:Agreed, but what is this Parish guy like?

Chicken.

In one way the top 5 is all a bit sad. Pretty much expected if you watched the games without looking for mistakes as the first thing you look at. Sad but expected? How so? Sad because the top 5 are already aging. Even the top 10 only has about 3 players under 25. Sad cause you weren't there this ye...

I don't think it's sad; it's just the reality with a developing team - the stalwarts will do what those who vote want more consistently. Happy to focus on the good performances by Robbo and Webster as an eye to the future - I feel pretty confident there will be some new names in the mix next year. ...

nothing a jab cant fix.... For the next 10 years? I'd spit it if we traded our first round pick on the bloke. Essendon **** us over with Lovett, we need to stand strong... we are in the better position. He is worth a first rounder for sure. Our problem is our pick is reasonably early. I think we ta...

SainterK wrote:

plugger66 wrote:In one way the top 5 is all a bit sad. Pretty much expected if you watched the games without looking for mistakes as the first thing you look at.

Sad but expected?

How so?

Sad because the top 5 are already aging. Even the top 10 only has about 3 players under 25.

#gosaintas wrote:

Saints94 wrote:

#gosaintas wrote:at least he can kick

How will we ever know?

not like he had a taste of AFL footy..

Saw enough evidence at Sandringham

Obviously not.

People get too carried away with 'inside goss'. At the end of the day, everything that really matters comes out in public. It's just a question of being patient. Ive got some unbelievable goss at the moment. Simply unbelievable. You have unbelievable dross that is true.... That's Gold , Teffers , p...

In one way the top 5 is all a bit sad. Pretty much expected if you watched the games without looking for mistakes as the first thing you look at.

A very umpired game. Better players, better umpires, better game to umpire. bulls*** and an excuse made by umpires and those that wave their flags. Plugger is able to wave flags with the best of them. :wink: Stinger sorry Saynta instead of trying to start something how about commenting on the game ...

People get too carried away with 'inside goss'. At the end of the day, everything that really matters comes out in public. It's just a question of being patient. Ive got some unbelievable goss at the moment. Simply unbelievable. You have unbelievable dross that is true.... That's Gold , Teffers , p...

Ferg and Milney in Bendigo.

Silly sweeping statement: "Umpires' decisions don't really affect the result of a game"; wrong. What about the one against Geelong: when Mav marked, and a Cat ran over the mark, and no 50 was given- would have put Mav right in front. the 4 goals gifted to the Wet Toast last night made thi...

Well it amazes me that the player with the highest Fantasy footy season stats doesn't get a mention, in a list of 40. (Jack had the third highest average, bettered only by two high possession ruckmen, Martin and Goldstein) So he had more of the footy +tackles, etc, than any other midfielder playing...

bigred wrote:I honestly believe that Sandy could have had a red hot crack at winning the flag.

This sucks.

Even if it effects the Saints in the future?

A very umpired game. Better players, better umpires, better game to umpire. bulls*** and an excuse made by umpires and those that wave their flags. I feel sorry for you if you don't think better players and umpires improve the performance. Surely you even see it in local footy? The other option is ...

Reckon he'd be wrapt with a 12 month contract, would come relatively cheap, and would add a bit of class to our forward line. The trade off is that he would add a positive to our forward line, but the negative is that he would take the place of a kid. I'd be happy if we got him. I can honestly say ...

A very umpired game. Better players, better umpires, better game to umpire.

Now he is someone I want at the saints!! Exactly the type of player we are lacking. Very good player. Those 2 years he played at Sandy I would have seen at least 15 games in that time and I thought he was the best of the bunch which included Kelly, Salem, Amon and a few others. Get him. Worth the r...

Unless the rule has changed if a player takes the ball out of the ruck and gets tackled it is a free kick. Only if he doesn't dispose of it correctly No - only if he is tackled (as I said unless the rule has changed) I don't get what you mean. You can grab it out of the rick and get tackled but as ...

mambo2706 wrote:Unless the rule has changed if a player takes the ball out of the ruck and gets tackled it is a free kick.

Only if he doesn't dispose of it correctly

mambo2706 wrote:Why is it Nic Nat can consistently take it out of the ruck, get tackled but not get pinged?

He is allowed to do that. Haven't seen any free in that area that is wrong