plugger66 wrote:

oakleighboy wrote:You are wrong on this one buddy.

Which part isnt true?

some sort of oakleigh brotherhood perhaps?

Bad call because I'm too much of a soft c**k to say otherwise. Lynch to the backline? bad call. too risky of a call. not a ross lyon call. he was recruited as a forward and we will hardly start experimenting with second game forwards in our back half. You need to throw up a new call. adam schneider...

Thinline wrote:Bad call because I'm too much of a soft c**k to say otherwise.

Lynch to the backline?

bad call. too risky of a call. not a ross lyon call.

he was recruited as a forward and we will hardly start experimenting with second game forwards in our back half.

saint58 wrote:He was a tough hard at it hbf who has played 40 od games was ok to a bit slow but got the ball good foot skills.

But he is only on the list because each club has to give GC17 a uncontracted player and he is it for us,well thats what i hear.

nonsense

Reminds me a little bit of Brett Voss. A player who was highly valued under the previous coaching staff but did not quite fit in to the current one. A shame really, because he was a quality player. Some players warm to different coaches, but it would definitely be a remarkable 'back from the brink' ...

I dont know how Simpkin and Alistair Smith compare speedwise, but Tom Simpkin would probably take a taller opponent than Smith. I was under the impression that Simpkin was a more Gilbert-like player, yet also quite good one on one. Obviously Gilbert is better at something, or everything, as he is a...

With Raph now out for the season, we will probably be looking for some sort of like for like replacement. I've hardly seen Miles play, but from all accounts he is a reliable defender with speed to attack with. He hardly gets a mention here, so would someone with more knowledge on Luke care to predic...

ignore p66 and please post your views, some of us would love to hear how the boys went ditto I agree as well. i knew you were on board :wink: Totally that P66 is a pain in the arse. If I ever come face to face with him I will give him plenty. A total f*** wit. self degradation. some people find it ...

plugger66 wrote:

FQF wrote:

Solar wrote:ignore p66 and please post your views, some of us would love to hear how the boys went

ditto

I agree as well.

i knew you were on board

Solar wrote:ignore p66 and please post your views, some of us would love to hear how the boys went

ditto

Moccha wrote:

FQF wrote:

Moccha wrote:We need some pace in the side maybe both Smith and Stanley might play. The only way to beat Port is to attack (relentlessly play on) and try and kick over 100 pts

If only your signature was still true...

Time for a change?

Let's give them a couple more chances to prove themselves.

Moccha wrote:We need some pace in the side maybe both Smith and Stanley might play. The only way to beat Port is to attack (relentlessly play on) and try and kick over 100 pts

If only your signature was still true...

plugger66 wrote:

stinger wrote:

FQF wrote:Al Smith had 37 touches and Rob Eddy had 25 with 8 tackles.

Encouraging stuff... is Smith a chance?

yes.....

Of course he is. He kicked a goal.

Where is the love?

Solar wrote:

FQF wrote:Al Smith had 37 touches and Rob Eddy had 25 with 8 tackles.

Encouraging stuff... is Smith a chance?

smithy must be close!!!

and also kicked a goal...

Al Smith had 37 touches and Rob Eddy had 25 with 8 tackles.

Encouraging stuff... is Smith a chance?

plugger66 wrote:

Eastern wrote:Who played well? !!

Heard that Simpkin was best and Johnson did well.

Two backmen.

That's handy...

Solar wrote:well done to sandy, sounds like the backline did well and we actually put a team away in the conditions....

could stanley and smith get a game? hmmmmmm

Dawson needs to be replaced. Maybe an elevation is necessary. Simpkin perhaps?

There are people in their 40s who have never seen St Kilda win a premiership That should have them choking back the tears. No one 'deserves' shyte. People are acting like we just got flogged in a qualifying final... it was round freaking 18. We will finish top 4. We will be ready. HTFU. Computer kn...

ace wrote:

FQF wrote:Finally Sandy have a convincing win putting some much needed pressure on the seniors.

Let's hope at lease someone demanded selection.

IN: Sandy
OUT: Seniors

I would feel pretty comfortable about Sautner playing in the red white and black.

Finally Sandy have a convincing win putting some much needed pressure on the seniors.

Let's hope at lease someone demanded selection.

Sandringham Zebras: Rhys Stanley nails a looooooooooooong goal against the wind, the margin is now 26 points and the Zebras look like pulling off a win that keeps their very slim finals chances alive! Sandringham Zebras: Al Smith kicks another one... Sandy are all over the Bullants... 32 point marg...

bigred wrote:What is his natural arc?

may aswell go very wide in his first game. it'll help the rest of his career.

To be fair, his role is not a simple one, and definitely not something that any kid would learn in junior footy. In that sense, Mini is coming in and having to forego many of his natural instincts in order to play his role. Perhaps giving him a more traditional role, like a small defender, or a rota...

Can McQualter make this his 'line in the sand match'. Can he come back firing like Dal Santo, Milne, and recently Sewell did before him. It's one thing for fringe players to be dropped - it happens every week - but usually when a top 22 player for two years of the best performing side in the comp in...

Great move in my opinion. Definitely a 'nothing to lose' approach with Mini given his form. There's no doubting Lynch's natural talent (apparently very clean disposal), and it is sometimes the case that the upgrade to the big stage, in a far better team brings out a much improved player. Let us hope.