axcellence wrote: ↑Thu 18 Apr 2024 9:15pm I feel for the saints fan who bought tickets or went to the match.

What about us rusted on people who pay $4,000 to pay for seats and sponsor a player???

What was the difference between the impact King’s hit had and this? Laura Kane, you’re screwing up. The system is broken. Fix it. No No No - The impact was the same and Cameron got the week - he even pled guilty - he is just a good bloke - nothing more than that. That is why we were recruiting good...

Freebird wrote: ↑Wed 17 Apr 2024 7:09pm I've been waiting for our local umpire/judicial resident to blindly explain

He has been very quiet since the Butters / Crouch discussion.

As part of the Tribunal Ruling, Cameron deemed a Good Bloke and gets off as a result!!!!!!!!!! AFL officially acknowledges that now that they make biased rulings based on their view of the player, and not just the action. I read the decision - this is beyond a joke He gets off an on field incident ...

85 Hill
78 Marshall
75 Steele
23 Windhager
11 Owens
6 Garcia
5 Cordy
4 Bonner
4 Byrnes
4 Sinclair
2 Ross
1 Membrey
1 Wanganeen-Milera
1 Wilson

Therefore
5 Hill
4 Marshall
3 Steele
2 Windhager
1 Owens

SaintPav wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2024 8:59am There was Scott Pendlebury earlier this season which should have been a week.

The list goes on.

This is the worst of the 'nothing to see here' situations - this was a deliberate - non football act - behind play!!!!

SMH!

The rest of the forwards must understand that they are just as good as King and to present in their own way and not play second fiddle. I think it is more that the rest of the team need to learn to always look for the best option. When Sharman is allowed to play forward you will note that he leads ...

I agree with Jacks Back and Yorkeys - but it is certainly not 'Throw the Baby out with the Bathwater' time

9.14 - Loss to Geelong 14.10 - Win against Collingwood 9.13 - Loss to Essendon 9.13 - Win against Richmond 12.7 - Loss to GWS Win Loss record not great - but at the end of the day (and I know that there have been some really horrendous parts of the games) we have not lost a game that we were not cap...

No No No No

Butters had his hands down - so he was reaching for the ball - nothing to see here - oh BTW - Butters is a Brownlow Favourite - Windhager not.

Windhager's arms were down but he was not reaching for the ball - a difference - apparently - that changes the Potential to cause injury.

bigcarl wrote: ↑Sun 14 Apr 2024 7:46pm Multiple routes to goal.

What a novel idea

shrodes wrote: ↑Sun 14 Apr 2024 2:31pm
Might be available for Thursday

I think Thursday will be too soon.

The tickets are spoken for.

I have 2 tickets available for the game on Thursday night

They are level 1 - Centre Wing - Second Row - directly opposite the Interchange.

If anyone is interested - please PM Me

The coaches of the 17 oppo teams endorse this thread wholeheartedly. After they stopped laughing. Imagine getting Nas, Windy, Owens in exchange. Then taking the cash and grabbing Tim English. Is it still laughable. English and Rowan swapping ruck/forward. Midfield depth sorted. All from trading one...

Those comparing Ben to Max this weekend - remember who each was playing against in the short time I have watched the Ben game - 2 frees - one for over the shoulder (soft) and one for holding - both gettable but needed to be kicked. However, he also flew for some and did not mark - and stayed down wh...

Are we winning the cup this year?

Are we even contending?

If the answer is no - use the year as a development one and GET GAMES INTO THE KIDS - including playing those in unfamiliar roles to develop them.

I know that there are things that can't be counted - like would Higgins be our top goal scorer if King was not bringing them to ground - would Hammer have as many shots if King was not taking the #1 defender(s) It takes 2 defenders most of the time to stop him - lower your eyes St Kilda and look for...

Least Caminiti took his full 30 secs 👍🤣 Even though we were 7 points down with 40 seconds to go I totally disagree with your criticism. He had to kick the goal. He took the time he needed. He kicked the goal- AND there were still 41 seconds on the clock at the next bounce . As we saw, still plenty ...

It’s just not one bad game though. It’s been a concerning trend. His first 3 games were all very good. His last 2 not so. Hardly a trend Doesn’t lead. Doesn’t work hard enough. Misses goals regularly. His game is very flawed and is what I’m talking about. I wonder if he has been instructed to stay ...

The Fireman wrote: ↑Sat 13 Apr 2024 8:56pmMarshall

I am afraid a 1 word vote cannot be counted - except for a 1

StPeter wrote: ↑Sat 13 Apr 2024 7:55pm

skeptic wrote: ↑Sat 13 Apr 2024 6:14pm Hope nobody minds. I fixed the thread title

Thanks, my mistake in my enthusiasm

Certainly a lot to be enthusiastic about

Add
Wilson
Phillipou
NAS
Owens
Windhager

The future feels promising

GWS player has prior run run run - Garcia tackles him - he basically just flops over the line for a throw in - no attempt to get rid of the ball.

PS This is after a very clear throw

Will be interesting to see if Matt Crouch is in trouble for head high bump on attempting to get the ball

I feel that Greene out would have changed the game. Not giving a 3 goal headstart probably would have made changed he game as well I agree - and Pou not kicking into the man on the mark and Owens not mongrel punting it OOTF but they are our issues The AFL has said it would penalize on Potential to ...