saynta wrote: ↑Wed 06 Mar 2019 6:37pm
The system last season didn’t allow for these types to be the best version of themselves.

Never a truer word has been spoken.

samoht wrote: ↑Tue 05 Mar 2019 1:57pm

rodgerfox wrote: ↑Tue 05 Mar 2019 9:43am
The dogshit that samoht regurgitates adnauseum is not only lazy and predictable - it's incorrect.

The popular horsesh1t being peddled on here - reducing everything down so as to blame the coach at every turn - is what's lazy and predictable.

Two wrongs don't make a right.

Samoht is getting to me and I now reluctantly accept the dual lead weights in the saddles are recruitment which seems to be predicated on hope for the ever elusive coming seasons rather than immediate impact, and AR. Max, mighty prospect that he may be is a WIP. Bytel a WIP. Where is a good ruckman...

Samoht is getting to me and I now reluctantly accept the dual lead weights in the saddles are recruitment which seems to be predicated on hope for the ever elusive coming seasons rather than immediate impact, and AR. Max, mighty prospect that he may be is a WIP. Bytel a WIP. Where is a good ruckman...

Goose is king wrote: ↑Sun 03 Mar 2019 11:27am For me Steele looks like he is moving towards elite and I love it

He already is.

The media just hasn't noticed it yet.

I don't understand. We have 8 on the interchange and yet no second ruck???????????????? Pierce looks like he has been concussed (should have been a free - no mention on the commentary) and we have Bruce as second ruck again FFS!!!!!! You realise it's a praccy match right? Exactly. Time to practice ...

Jacks Back wrote: ↑Sat 02 Mar 2019 1:44pm I don't understand. We have 8 on the interchange and yet no second ruck???????????????? Pierce looks like he has been concussed (should have been a free - no mention on the commentary) and we have Bruce as second ruck again FFS!!!!!!

You realise it's a praccy match right?

When you have a guy with known injury concerns over the last 2 years and you combine that with the rumours then I think some fans have every right to question the decision making process. The fact that a player cannot perform and cannot get out on the park is the reason that some Saints supporters ...

They just aren’t a very good football club and maybe there’s a reason why they’ve won just one premiership in 121 years, back in 1966. Ouch. That's hard to read. Not sure how I feel about that comment. I guess it's true but bloody hell it starting to smack of getting personal rather than objective ...

I honestly don't see any relevance to anything. We all knows drug use is 'rife' across the comp, and we know for a fact that Brownlow Medallists and premiership players are into the gear. So who gives a f***? Yeah good call. Maybe next year the AFL can replace the JLT with the LSD Community Series....

Conclusion. Barret is a flog and made s*** up on this one. Thanks Johnny Longmire and Simon Lethlean. I don't think journalists just make s*** up. Barrett's problem, and it's what makes him so woeful as a journalist, is that he's not actually saying anything. He's making insinuations. He's not repo...

I find that much more likely than Barrett randomly making up a story about a small, bottom club and a passed his prime, sort of known player. What is the story though? You seem to be defending a 'story' when there isn't even a story to defend. What is Barrett actually saying? You defend Barrett, be...

I find that much more likely than Barrett randomly making up a story about a small, bottom club and a passed his prime, sort of known player. What is the story though? You seem to be defending a 'story' when there isn't even a story to defend. What is Barrett actually saying? You defend Barrett, be...

I honestly don't see any relevance to anything.

We all knows drug use is 'rife' across the comp, and we know for a fact that Brownlow Medallists and premiership players are into the gear.


So who gives a f***?

I would say he has more credibility and inside knowledge about the AFL than anyone on here. It also seems to coincide with other things that have been said. Not with me and I suspect the bulk of the football loving public. A stain on the game imho. Even Richo called bulls*** on the flog's statement...

Kind of funny story. I remember talking to Butterss at Docklands after a Saints game one day (the year he came in) and I accidently spilt my beer over his leg and shoe when I shook his hand. I had one of those moments where this high flying intelligent super serious businessman thought I was probab...

Grant only drew the moral high ground on Butterss behavior when the fell out over money. Prior to that he either turned a blind eye or didn’t care. I thought the relationship soured when Butterss ditched his missus. I thought the Thomas' were very close with Mrs Butterss, and felt that Rod chose th...

Cairnsman wrote: ↑Mon 18 Feb 2019 10:07pm

You said you never said he didn't have any strengths. Logic...

That's pretty flimsy logic. Even for an internet squabble.

More making stuff up and re writing history by you. ? He did get overlooked didn't he? Which clubs and why was he overlooked, you must know because you know he doesn't have any strengths. Your seems like our club is crap and hopeless and chose him even though he had no strengths, yeah makes sense. ...

So if you think he has strengths what are they? I have no idea if he has strengths nor what they are. And no one, no current or ex-players, the club, supporters can tell me what his elite skills are. I certainly can't see what they are from the outer. No evidence at all. All good coaches have some ...

More making stuff up and re writing history by you. ? He did get overlooked didn't he? Which clubs and why was he overlooked, you must know because you know he doesn't have any strengths. Your seems like our club is crap and hopeless and chose him even though he had no strengths, yeah makes sense. ...

Cairnsman wrote: ↑Mon 18 Feb 2019 8:41pm
More making stuff up and re writing history by you.

?

He did get overlooked didn't he?

But an image that is still based on no facts, just because things weren't handled correctly doesn't mean Richo doesn't have any strengths as a coach. What are his strengths? Clearly gathering feedback.isn't one of them. Given he had no idea what the Captain's opinion on him was until he opened the ...

But an image that is still based on no facts, just because things weren't handled correctly doesn't mean Richo doesn't have any strengths as a coach. What are his strengths? Clearly gathering feedback.isn't one of them. Given he had no idea what the Captain's opinion on him was until he opened the ...

I'm defending the club, not Alan, with all things considered I thought it was the right thing to do by letting Alan go around again in 2019. Blind Freddy could see there were other issues at play for our poor results in 2018 and sacking Alan just would have put the club into a nose dive and papered...